Answer:
So project two is better because it will increase the wealth of Chandler Tire by $ 18,598.33 more than Project 1
Explanation:
<em>To determine which project to be selected, we will compute the present value (PV) of the two projects and select the one with a higher PV.</em>
Present value is the today worth of the future cash inflows from a project. The higher the present value the more wealth is been created. So a project with a higher PV is better if two are been compared.
So when comparing two projects, the one with a higher PV is better.
<em>PV of Poject 1 </em>
PV = 52,000 × 1-(1.015)^(-6)
$196,793.10
<em>PV of Project 2</em>
PV = 48,000 × 1- (1.015)^(-8)
$215,391.43
So project two is better because it will increase the wealth of Chandler Tire by $ 18,598.33 more than Project 1
Answer:
a) $101354
Explanation:
To calculate the future balance of the interest-earning account use following formula
FV = PV x ( 1 + r )^n
Where
FV = Future value = Balance of Interest-earning account after 3 years = ?
PV = present value = Amounr deposited in the account = $90,000
r = Periodic interest rate = 4% x 6/12 = 2%
n = Numbers of periods = Numbers of years x Compounding periods per year = 3 years x 2 periods per year = 6 periods
Placing values in the formula
FV = $90,000 x ( 1 + 2% )^6
FV = $101,354
Answer:
The correct answer is the second option: The price level is constant in the long run.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept of the <em>"aggregate supply"</em> refers to the total amount of goods and services that firms are willing and are able to offer at a certain price level given and at a determine period of time. Moreover, at the long-run the aggregate supply curve is not affected by many variables as it is in the short run and this is due to the fact in the long run the economy is said to be at full capacity and optimally and also because the changes in the aggregate demand are only affective in the short run to the economy's total output.
Answer:
$162,500
Explanation:
Depletion is used to expense the cost of extracting natural resources.
Depletion expense = (unit extracted in 2017 / total units that could be extracted) x (Cost- salvage value)
(1,500,000 / 12,000,000) x ( $1,500,000 - $200,000) = 0.125 × 1,300,000 = $162,500
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: give too much weight to a small number of vivid observations.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the case that a close friend had told you that he had a bad experience in a certain place, a restaurant in particular this time, does not states the fact that it will always be like that for every person that goes to that place because it may have been a bad day for the employees and that impacts at their work while if you go any other day every detail is taking care nicely. Therefore that the people give too much weight to small number of vivid observations due to the fact that the article published in the newspaper must have been made with over dozens of observations and comments, not just one, and the major agreement is that those places are good ones to go to eat.
