The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is:
(1) $15,054
(2) $12,990
Explanation:
The required table is not given in the question. Please find below the attachment of the table.
Given:
Future value,
= $30,000
If discounting rate is 9%, the present value will be:
= 
= 
= 
=
($)
If discounting rate is 11%, the present value will be:
= 
= 
= 
=
($)
Answer:
Both options C and D are correct.
Explanation:
Inflation refers to an increase in the general price level of goods and services overtime. Since it is conveyed in the question that the general price level in a later year became twice as high, inflation definitely occurred. Hence, option D is correct.
Nominal GDP is the value of the total output at current market prices. Real GDP adjusts that value for inflation. As prices double, nominal GDP ought to increase from $400m to $800m. However, it actually rose to $1000m. This additional increase of $200m shows that the real GDP has risen. However, the increase in real GDP is less than 100%. This implies option C is also correct.