According to Gibbons v. Ogden, a state <u>can not interfere with the power of congress to regulate commerce.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The case of Gibbons and the Ogden was presented in the Supreme Court in the United States of America. It was in the year 1824 and was one of the most important cases of that time.
According to this case, a principle was established and it established a legislative enactment. According to this, a state could not interfere in the power of the congress and the power that was talked about in this principle was about interfering with the regulation of the commerce. It was only in the hand of the congress and not with the states.
Answer:
During the late 1940s and early 1950s, the prospect of communist subversion at home and abroad seemed frighteningly real to many people in the United States. These fears came to define–and, in some cases, corrode–the era’s political culture. For many Americans, the most enduring symbol of this “Red Scare” was Republican Senator Joseph R. McCarthy of Wisconsin.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Freedom of the press is held hostage as journalists observe through prison bars.
were to establish the terms of long lasting peace between European powers after the French Revolution and rhe Napoleonic wars and to finalize European boundaries in order to create a balance between each of the major counties of Europe
Well Hitlers views obviously contrasted with the average american for a number of reasons. One such reason was for the brutal invasions carried out by Hitlers army. Another reasons is the many acts of genocide committed by his army. It is because of these things that Hitler was viewed by many Americans as a force of pure evil and destruction.
