Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer:
Autobiographical memory
Explanation:
The person who has highly superior autobiographical memory has more chances to recall the memory with more accuracy, details and with the experience that occurs daily. People test the consistency of memory. This memory is a combination of episodic and semantic memory. It is also called explicit memory.
Thus here in the above uncle, Charlie loves to tell the stories. Charlie tells the story that evolves previous time but he was a great storyteller. so that it is very interesting to hear it because of autobiographical memory.
Answer:
It's going rather good, thank you for asking. also if you can, please make me brainliest cause I want my rank to go up. I HOPE YOU HAVE AN AMAZING DAY
The correct answer is "Giraldo feels he cannot really be himself at work, and this lack of self-actualization causes his unhappiness."
Giraldo is unhappy at work. One explanation that is consistent with psychoanalytic theories of personality is that Giraldo feels he cannot really be himself at work, and this lack of self-actualization causes his unhappiness.
Sigmund Freud developed an important psychoanalytic theory of personality that says that humans have conflicts due to the constant interaction of three factors he identified that happen inside the human brain. One he called the ego, the superego, and the id. In this case, Giraldo finds no satisfaction at the workplace because in his mind he thinks he cannot express how he truly is and be himself. This limits his experience and satisfaction in the office.
