Answer:
The answer is stated below:
Explanation:
If the SEC and the AICPA, worked altogether in order to share the information, they might have detected the fraud prior. The case states that the Madoff Securities does not required to submit the peer review program to AICPA as Friehling, had recorded that he did not perform or conduct any audits.
Recommendation
1. The policy execution for the exchange of the information among the two firms would be useful to detect the fraud.
2. The PCAOB should spend more resources an attending the hotline of whistle blowing through executing the policies which need certain complaints to be addressed effectively.
3. The firms or company should have done more in order to verify the financial statements assertions, which surrounds the investments. The PCAOB need to execute the policy that require the companies (such as Madoff Securities) to correctly answer the inquiries of the auditor.
Answer:
Revenue/Income; Expenses
Explanation:
Profit or Loss is determined as the difference between the revenue made by a business (also known as its income), and the expenses spent in the process of generating that revenue.
If the difference is positive, the outcome is a profit. If the difference is negative, the outcome is a loss.
Answer:
- I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting and do some research.
Explanation:
<em>I think Ben is right</em>. Even though the statement is technically correct, it may mislead customers.
Customers may interpret the phrase "<em>no sugar added</em>" as if the product did not contain any sugar.
Thus, customers interested in drinking beverages without sugar at all might think they are "safe" consuming the smoothie beverage, when in reallity each <em>smoothie's bottle contains sugar 35 g of naturally occurring sugars from the fruit.</em>
Customers deserve to be certain on what they are buying, thus the labels must be a sincere help for them, and not ambiguos at all.
This is a "gray zone" and an example of what in ethics is called a dilema.
I think the decision should be shared by a wider team and based on some research.
I think Ben should encourage the Senior Management to call a multidisciplynary meeting, where the subject is widely discussed. Also, I would suggest Ben to do some research, look for precedents about labeling in the industry, and try to learn the opinion of the FDA about this sensitive matter.
false: it means you dont have to agree with them but you have to respect their opinion
Answer:
$750
Explanation:
Calculation to determine what the amount of supplies expense reported on the Year 2 income statement is:
Using this formula
Supplies expense=Balance in Supplies account
+Cash paid to purchase supplies)-Supplies on hand
Let plug in the formula
Supplies total amount =($200 + $600) -$50
Supplies total amount=$800-$50
Supplies total amount=$750
Therefore the amount of supplies expense reported on the Year 2 income statement is:$750.
