Well, if you look close enough there is proof look at the way that the continents are shaped and some fossils have been found in 2 places but on completely different continents.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure its d, The Babylonians took over the Fertile Crescent.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option 2
Explanation:
The complete question is
How are countries’ economies similar, even if they have access to different resources and are in different locations?
- They all must answer the questions of what to produce and how to produce it based on the resources they have.
- They all use the same method or share the same beliefs when making decisions about what to manufacture.
- They all must produce a certain number of different products to have a successful economy.
- They all must achieve a certain ratio of goods produced compared to goods purchased to make their economies work.
Solution
The countries have similar economy only when they have similarity in beliefs or operation. For instance countries having different geography, resources etc. can have capitalist economy depending on the fact that it put more emphasis to business and revenue generation than the betterment of society. Like wise similarity is operation such as opening the economy for the global market make it a globalized economy
Hence, option 2 is correct
Answer: The increase of voting right by lowering property requirements became known as Jacksonian Democracy. Andrew Jackson was a popular politician who supported majority rule and benefited from the expansion of democracy. This led to more common people voting, and the group of people supported Jackson.
Explanation:
Grandfather clauses were designed to prevent poor and illiterate African Americans from voting.
This term was coined in the 19th century when new rules for literacy tests, poll taxes and requirements for voting were established.
Some white people who did not fulfill the requirements were still allowed to vote because their ancestors ( grandfathers ) had the right to vote. This was a way to make voting possible for white Americans, and to make voting almost impossible for black people.
Today, this term applies to a provision in which an old rule continues to apply to some existing situation while a new rule will apply to future cases.