a) Proof by contradiction is different from traditional proof as it accepts a single example showing that a statement is false, instead of having the need to derive a general relationship for all input values.
b) The statement is true by contradiction as the sum of the measures is of 160º, and not 180º.
<h3>What are supplementary angles?</h3>
Two angles are called supplementary angles if the sum of their measures has a value of 180º.
The measures of the angles in this problem are given as follows:
Then the sum of the measures of this angles is given as follows:
90 + 70 = 160º.
Which is a different sum of 160º, confirming the statement that the angles are not supplementary by contradiction.
A similar problem, involving proof by contradiction and supplementary angles, is presented at brainly.com/question/28889480
#SPJ1
It's not why...it can be the outcome of ones decisions of getting protection or just want to spend their last minutes with their family and friends
Answer:
The area is 432cm squared.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the area, first you split the figure into 2 rectangles.
The rectangle facing up would be 8cm by 30cm, and the rectangle pointing to the left would be 8cm by 24cm (because you subtract 8 by 32). Next, with those numbers, you can easily find the area. 8cm x 30cm equals to 240cm squared, and 8cm x 24cm equals to 192cm squared. Lastly, you add the both of the areas together, 240cm and 192cm, and you get 432cm squared.
The first thing you should know are properties of exponents to solve the problem.
For this case the radical form is given by the writing of the expression in the form of root.
We have then:
t^-3/4 =4^root(t^-3)=4^root ((1)/(t^3))
answer t^-3/4=4^root((1)/(t^3))
