Answer:
the depreciation that should be charged over the useful life each year is $20,000
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation expense using the straight line method is shown below:
= (Purchase cost of an equipment - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($135,000 - $15,000) ÷ 6 years
= $120,000 ÷ 6 years
= $20,000
hence, the depreciation that should be charged over the useful life each year is $20,000
Answer:
No, their economic cost of enrolling in the business program is not the same for both,
Explanation:
The explicit costs of going back to college are the same for Walter and Jesse, e.g. they might be $20,000 per year, or even $30,000 doesn't matter for this analysis. But Walter is currently working as a teacher and that means taht if he decides to go to college, his implicit costs will include the forgone salary as a teacher which is $50,000 per year. Implicit costs are opportunity costs, i.e. additional costs or benefits lost from choosing one activity or investment instead of another alternative.
Since Jesse is not working, whether she goes back to college or not will not affect her income, it will still be $0, but if Walter goes back to college he will lose his salary.
Answer:
$63,932.91
Explanation:
FV = $825,000
Number of payments = 4 quarters * 3 years = 12
Rate = 4.45%, assuming per annual
The amount company need to save each quarter is the payment amount.
We can easily calculate payment amount by formula in excel =PMT(4.45%/4,12,,825000,1) = 63,932.91
The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative B and for the United States is alternative U. China Production Possibilities Product: A - B - C - D - E - F Apparel: 120,000 - 96,000 - 72,000 - 48,000 - 24,0000 Chemicals(tons): 0 - 24 - 48 - 72 - 96 - 120 U.S. Production Possibilities Product: R - S - T - U - V - W Apparel: 40,000 - 32,000 - 24,000 - 16,0000 - 8,0000 Chemicals(tons): 0 - 16 - 32 - 48 - 64 - 80a. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two countries should specialize?
Answer:
A 15.64%
Explanation:
300*1.18 = 354
354*0.02 = 7.08
354 - 7.08 = 346.92
rate of return = 346.92/300
= 15.64%
Therefore, The rate of return on the fund is 15.64%
