Answer:
E) It would not necessarily be considered high elsewhere.
Explanation:
The US inflation rate during 1979 was 11.26%, during 1980 it was 13.55%, and during 1981 it was 10.33%. These numbers may seem very high for American standards, but they aren't really high once you compare them to other nation's inflation rate.
For example, if we look at what is happening in two South American countries right now; Currently Venezuela is facing a hyperinflation measured by millions, and Argentina's current inflation rate is around 60%.
Back in the 1980s, hyperinflation rates were much more common. Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Nicaragua, all suffered from hyperinflation (inflation rates in the 1,000s).
The US dollar is considered a very stable currency, that is why an inflation rate of around 10% was considered extremely high for American standards, but not so high compared to the rest of the world.
Answer:
d) economic and legal
Explanation:
As Juan is going to start a business by satisfying the unfulfilled needs of his community, it means definitely going to target a niche market, therefore chances of success are quite higher but as far as economic and legal factors are concerned, they surely either can increase the restrictions over him with the help of many possible laws and adding various taxes or can lower the risk of initiating a new venture by finding him a suitable financier who could finance his business effectively.
Answer:
The portion of the initial amount that was given away is:
= 0.40
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Number of apples available = 10
Number of those apples given to a friend for Christmas = 4
The portion given away = 4/10 = 0.4
This represents 40% of the whole.
b) The portion given away to the friend for Christmas is a proportion of the whole. In this case, it represents just 40% of the 10 apples. This means that only 60% or 0.60 of the original apples are still available or on hand because 40% had been given away.
Answer:
The employer wins because he is acting on court orders.
Explanation:
Discrimination in the workplace is a punishable offense by the law. This act of promoting one female for every male promoted is a remedy to being found guilty of discrimination by the court.
In this case where he has been sued again for reverse discrimination, he (employer) is going to win this particular one because he was only acting on court order. The one female for every male was imposed on him by the court. So he is protected from this reverse discrimination accusations by his disgruntled employees.
Answer:
Credit to Gain on Sale of Investments for $2,400
