1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irga5000 [103]
3 years ago
11

A historian claims that the Boxer Rebellion should be blamed entirely on the

History
2 answers:
Elis [28]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A counterclaim to this historian's claim is that the Boxer Rebellion was a response to the European influence in China

Explanation:

posledela3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

A counterclaim to this historian's claim is that the Boxer Rebellion was a response to the European influence in China.

Explanation:

The Boxer Rebellion was a movement, started in November 1899 and ended on September 7, 1901, which emerged in China against the foreign influence in commerce, politics, religion and technology of the last years of the 19th century. In August 1900, about 230 foreigners, thousands of Chinese Christians, an unknown number (between 50,000 and 100,000) of rebels, their sympathizers and other Chinese had been killed in the revolt and its repression.

Hope this helps!!

You might be interested in
Select the correct text in the passage.
JulijaS [17]

<u>This portion of the text shows Hobbes supported an absolute ruler:</u>

  • <em>Men are continually in competition for honour and dignity . . . and consequently amongst men there ariseth on that ground, envy, and hatred, and finally war. ... No wonder if there be somewhat else required, besides [contract], to make their agreement constant and lasting; which is a common power to keep them in awe and to direct their actions to the common benefit. </em>
  • <em> The only way to erect such a common power, as may be able to defend them from the invasion of foreigners, and the injuries of one another . . . is to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men, that may reduce all their wills, by plurality of voices, unto one will.</em>

Further detail:

Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called Leviathan in 1651.  The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast.  Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society.  In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast).    Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests.  So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen.  And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did they write the declaration of independence?
Kaylis [27]
So we would have rights as Americans .
3 0
3 years ago
Who is disadvantaged by mercantilism​
r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

rival nations economy

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the historical circumstances that led to the historical development depicted in the image above. pls help me with this​
Diano4ka-milaya [45]

Answer:

Germany unification occurs while Austria-Hungary separation occurs.

Explanation:

In Germany, due to patriotism all the components are assembled and made as one country while in Austria-Hungary due to patriotism all sections are segregated from one another. The unification of Germany happens due to two combats, Prussia with Austria and Prussia with France. these two combats begins to patriotism in Germany and then violent nationalism happens which commences to first world war. This disunity among the Individuals ultimately led to the destruction of Austria.

3 0
3 years ago
The immediate effect of andrew jackson's attack on the second bank of the united states in 1834 was
Katyanochek1 [597]
An expansion of credit and speculation. 
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe the progessive era
    5·1 answer
  • What is one counter-argument to the premise that the wealth gap is a serious problem which needs to be addressed?
    6·2 answers
  • The statement that best describes the status of singlehood in early America would be
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement about the relationship between East, West, and South Africa with Europe is correct?
    14·1 answer
  • What got the u.s into Vietnam​
    13·1 answer
  • Who went to the pan african conference in 1900
    15·2 answers
  • Which best describes the Cherokee Nation today?
    13·2 answers
  • What happened to Malcolm X after he left the Nation of Islam?
    10·1 answer
  • In the space below, explain the reasons for the differences of opinion between the three factions in the U.S. during this time a
    11·1 answer
  • Who likes eminem here
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!