Answer:Supervisors who allow their rating in one area to influence their rating in another area on performance appraisals are susceptible to the <u><em>Halo effect.</em></u>
<em>Under halo effect the evaluator lets one or two feature of the appraisal or behavior of the worker unduly influence all other characteristic of the worker's performance. </em>
<u><em>Therefore in this case the correct option is (c).</em></u>
Answer:
Effect on income= $0
Explanation:
<u>Because the company has excess capacity and it is a special offer that would not affect normal sales, we will not include the fixed costs.</u>
Effect on income= total sales revenue - total variable cost
Effect on income= 24*4,960 - (20 + 4)*4,960
Effect on income= $0
Answer:II) More risk-averse investors will invest less in the optimal risky portfolio and more in the risk-free security than less risk-averse investors. III) Investors choose the portfolio that maximizes their expected utility.
Explanation:The capital allocation line is a line created in a graph by investors in an economy to display or identify the potential risks involved in taking risky decisions. This line is one the determining factors to ensure that the investor has adequate knowledge about the risky nature of a capital investment.
Investors generally choose portfolios that guarantee maximum profits with reduced chances of loss. More risk averse investor will choose or opt for less risky portfolio.
Answer:
$50
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the intrinsic per share stock price be immediately after the repurchase
First step
Total Assets=Value of operations of 20,000+ Short term investments of 1000
Total Assets=$21,000
Second step
Equity =Assets - Debt
Equity= $21,000-$6,000
Equity= $15,000
Now let determine the intrinsic per share stock price
Intrinsic per share stock price=$15,000/300
Intrinsic per share stock price=$50
Therefore the Intrinsic value per share will be $50 immediately after the repurchase has occured.
Answer:
The correct answer is normative analysis.
Explanation:
A positive analysis is the one that attempts to reflect reality with statements of cause and effect and is used mainly in microeconomics. On the other hand, a normative analysis, in which reality is prescribed, that is, we go beyond explanation and prediction, value judgments are used.
In contrast to the positive analysis, the normative analysis responds how the law should achieve efficiency objectives. This analysis assumes that efficiency is an objective that law should reflect and that legal norms should change when they fail. From this perspective, efficiency is a social value that the Law should promote.
