Answer:
b. could be low because people might adjust their expectations quickly if they found anti-inflation policy credible
Explanation:
In the given situation, it is mentioned that the rational expectations proponets said that the sacrified ratio would be lesser as the people wants to adjust their expectations in a fastest way in the case when they found that the anti-inflation policy is credible
Therefore as per the given situation, the option b is correct
Answer:
If the marginal propensity to save is 0.12, the marginal propensity to consume(mpc) is 0.88, and the multiplier is 8.33.
Explanation:
From the question, we are given the following:
mps = Marginal propensity to save = 0.12
The marginal propensity to consume (mpc) and the multiplier can therefore be calculated as follows:
mpc = 1 - mps ........................ (1)
Substituting the values for mps into equation (1), we have:
mpc = 1 - 0.12
mpc = 0.88
Also, we have:
Multiplier = 1 / mps ..................... (2)
Substituting the values for mps into equation (2), we have:
Multiplier = 1 / 0.12
Multiplier = 8.33
Therefore, if the marginal propensity to save is 0.12, the marginal propensity to consume(mpc) is 0.88, and the multiplier is 8.33.
A couple of years: Is usually when a budget is usually constructed.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Should be.
Explanation:
From the efficiency perspective, we shall consider the relationship between the benefits and the costs. If we subtract the cost from the benefits and the result is positive, we could say that it is convenient to continue with the activities of the operations being carried out.
In that case, Jones's benefits are (100) but his cost is Smith's damages (60). Then:
100 - 60 = (+)40;
which implies Jones <em>should be</em> allowed to play his opera music.
