Answer:
- by noticing how the character interacts with other characters
- by noticing details about what the character says, does, and thinks
- by noticing the context, and use it to make inferences about the character
- by noticing how the other characters perceive the character
Explanation:
The writer uses indirect characterization to portray the character. She/He can use this characterization to hold readers fascinated so the readers want to follow every step of character. By following every step of character, the readers will be curious to find out what will happen to the character. The indirect characterization refers to the writer's will to portray the character's personality using speech, actions and appearance.
Also, indirect characterization could help the character's behavior towards other characters and their interaction. This could help to find out the character's attributes and feelings.
The other character can perceive character more objective and notice the reason why the character does some actions or feel in some situations.
Everything the character says, does and thinks is useful to explain the character's actions or intentions. The context can help the readers to conclude and make inferences so they could better understand the character.
It will have to be $19.00 hope it helps
The statement best evaluates the effectiveness of the evidence in the text is the argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including well-researched studies and verifiable data.
<h3>What is social media?</h3>
Social media is a group of websites that have applications that use in interaction between people virtually
The options are attached:
- The argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including well-researched studies and verifiable data.
- The argument is convincing because the authors use varied forms of relevant evidence, including eyewitness accounts and personal anecdotes.
- The argument is not convincing because the authors support their points only with their own opinions, which is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.
- The argument is not convincing because the authors focus only on facts and data related to bit .ly links and usage, which is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.
Thus, the correct option is 1.
Learn more about social media
brainly.com/question/9564823
#SPJ1
I am pretty sure that the answer is 6. Not 100% sure ,but that’s my best guess.
