Answer:
Short answer: Yes.
Explanation:
The Vietnam War saw to the US's superior industrial, population, and military superiority, as well as the extensive usage of tactics and military industrial advantages. In fact, the Vietcong, even with the then USSR and Communist China's backing, was slowly losing grip and was losing at that point. However, the anti-war viewpoint became increasingly popular, as the reason for the US to join was inadequate at best, and the views of fighting another countries battle and seeing their own young men come home wrapped in the American flag' was unbearable to the US general public, therefore support was withdrawn. If the US continued to push after the Tet Offensive, then the US would have been able to claim the Vietnam War as a victory, rather than a strategic withdrawal, which led to the eventual demise of South Vietnam.
~
1, 3, 4, and 7 are true the rest are false.
Answer:
The case is in the jury selection phase, and the trial will follow.
Explanation:
From the question we are informed about a scenerio whereby Lawyers for each side of a case are questioning people who received a jury summons. The part of the trial process this describe jury selection phase and the trial will follow. During this jury selection phase, Lawyers as well as judges will proceed with selection of juries, which is “voir dire,” process, and it implies truth speaking, some questions will be asked from the potential jurors by the judge and attorneys,the question is to know their competency of serving in the case, then the next thing that will follow is the trial
Answer:
The middles colonies had rich farmland and a moderate climate. This made it a more suitable place to grow grain and livestock than New England. ... The Southern colonies had fertile farmlands which contributed to the rise of cash crops such as rice, tobacco, and indigo.
