Answer:
the answers are the government, and companies
Answer: Not very but somewhat
Explanation:
They fought it but a few certainly turned around
The French had more casualties than the Britain or the United states in the World war 1 because of bad strategy in the war.
Explanation:
- France needed a moment to recover 'Alsace-Lorraine', a territory they had failed to the Germans in 1871 (Franco-Prussian war).
- Some archaeologists debate France performed a significant position in the war come about.
- The losses of soldiers produced 700,000 dowagers and higher than 1,000,000 waifs.
- Between 81,000 and 97,000 men from the French territories were shot, including 26,000 Algerians.
- Of France's total count 1 out of 20 were shot. 27,000 French soldiers were shot on August 22nd, 1914 at the Battle of Charleroi.
Answer:Hope This Helps
Explanation:
On February 4, 1887, both the Senate and House passed the Interstate Commerce Act, which applied the Constitution’s “Commerce Clause”—granting Congress the power “to Regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States”—to regulating railroad rates. Small businesses and farmers were protesting that the railroads charged them higher rates than larger corporations, and that the railroads were also setting higher rates for short hauls than for long-distance hauls. Although the railroads claimed economic justification for policies that favored big businesses, small shippers insisted that the railroads were gouging them.
It took years for Congress to respond to these protests, due to members’ reluctance to have the government interfere in any way with corporate policies. In 1874 legislation was introduced calling for a federal railroad commission. The bill passed the House, but not the Senate. When Congress failed to act, some states adopted their own railroad regulations. Those laws were struck down in 1886, when the Supreme Court ruled in that the state of Illinois could not restrict the rates that the Wabash Railroad was charging because its freight traffic moved between the states, and only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce. Continued public anger over unfair railroad rates prompted Illinois senator Shelby M. Cullom to hold the hearings that led to the enactment of the Interstate Commerce Act.
That law limited railroads to rates that were “reasonable and just,” forbade rebates to high-volume users, and made it illegal to charge higher rates for shorter hauls. To hear evidence and render decisions on individual cases, the act created the Interstate Commerce Commission. This was the first federal independent regulatory commission, and it served as a model for others that would follow, from the Federal Trade Commission to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Evolving technology eventually made the purpose of the ICC obsolete, and in 1995 Congress abolished the commission, transferring its remaining functions to the Surface Transportation Board. But while the ICC has come and gone, its creation marked a significant turning point in federal policy. Before 1887, Congress had applied the Commerce Clause only on a limited basis, usually to remove barriers that the states tried to impose on interstate trade. The Interstate Commerce Act showed that Congress could apply the Commerce Clause more expansively to national issues if they involved commerce across state lines. After 1887, the national economy grew much more integrated, making almost all commerce interstate and international. The nation rather than the Constitution had changed. That development turned the Commerce Clause into a powerful legislative tool for addressing national problems.
Answer:
A) They believed the American colonists were incapable of cooperating in their own defense.
Explanation:
Options:
A. They believed the American colonists were incapable of cooperating in their own defense.
B. Native American tribes were sure to side with the French over the British.
C. The colonists protested against the deployment of British troops in North America.
D. The king insisted that the colonies were not generating enough income to support a war.
As a result of Britain's humiliation, the potential for French intervention and a European war became more and more likely. North's administration, concerned about a war with France, wanted to mend relations with the American colonies and was willing to allow them some autonomy to that end in 1775. However, by 1778, the autonomy granted to the colonies had become insufficient.
