Answer:
Mandy Capital Debit: 100,000
Brittney Capital Credit: 100,000
Explanation:
The journal entry will be recorded as above. Mandy sold equity worth $100,000, so we will record the entry on transfer of equity by the equity value sold. Now, for this equity value both partners can decide the amount in which one will sell to other, which in this scenario is $85,000.
Safety and self- actualization are examples of emotional appeals.
<h3> </h3><h3>What is emotional appeal?</h3>
An emotional appeal is a method of persuasion and sentimental approach designed mainly to create an emotional response. Emotional appeal is specially used in advertising and politics.
For employees, job security, safety, and self-actualization matters the most. The employer can boost employees' motivation and improve their efficiency by offering them all of the above.
Employees emotions can be attached to the job by way of developing in them a feeling of control and leadership, by appreciations and offering permanency.
Hence, safety and self-actualization are examples of emotional appeal.
Learn more about emotional appeal here:
brainly.com/question/1748019
Answer: c. Risky assets into safer assets
Explanation:
The process of asset transformation refers to the conversion of risky assets into safer assets. Asset transformationa is simply a form of transformation in which financial institutions like banks use deposits in the generation of revenue through the pooling deposits in order to make loans. It has to do with transforming bank liabilities into bank assets.
Answer:
An exception based on public policy.
Explanation:
Employment at will according to the United States is a doctrine that permits the employer and employee to work together in an indefinite period of time, whereas they are able to terminate their contract with any necessary fair clause.
In many counties around the world, employers always look for reasons to terminate or stop their employees from working, whereas an exception based on public policy negate this doctrine.
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
