First we solve this equation:
x = cos^-1(0) = pi/2 and 3pi/2
Now, this is the answer for angles between 0 and 2pi
but there are "negative angles" and angles larger than 2pi
so the general solution that includes all of these cases is:
x = pi/2 + n*pi
here n is any integer.
Answer: the number of multiple-choice questions in the math test is 35 and the number of open-ended questions in the math test is 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the number of multiple-choice questions in the math test.
Let y represent the number of open-ended questions in the math test.
The math test has 38 questions. It means that
x + y = 38
This test consists of multiple-choice questions worth 4 points each and open-ended questions worth 20 points each. The total number of points is 200. It means that
4x + 20y = 200 - - - - - - - - - -1
Substituting x = 38 - y into equation 1, it becomes
4(38 - y) + 20y = 200
152 - 4y + 20y = 200
- 4y + 20y = 200 - 152
16y = 48
48/16
y = 3
Substituting y = 3 into x = 38 - y, it becomes
x = 38 - 3 = 35
Answer:
f(x) = -2.5x + 4
Step-by-step explanation:
If you go down 5 units and 2 units to the right then there is another point so the slope is -5/2 which is the same thing as -5 divided by 2. So it’s -2.5 as the slope and for the y- intercept, there is only one point on there and it is on 4. So the function is
f(x) = -2.5x + 4
I hope this helps
(I deserve to be marked the brainliest)
Answer:
1. A is the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is the statement in which everything is operating as expected; nothing unusual is going on.
2. C is the alternative hypothesis. The problem says that you are looking to see whether or not the machine is filling with an average of 24 ounces, so it could be over or under filling. B only accounts for under filling.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
True, the scores are not valid.
Step-by-step explanation:
The test supposed to be measuring intelligence. We can assume that the intelligence of most people relatively stable (will not change too much over a short amount of time), and can expect it should go upward with brain growth and education. But the test seems to give a huge decrease from the first and second results. Then the third result is a huge increase that even higher than the first test.
We don't know the true value of the subject, but seeing the huge gap for every repetition we can tell that the test result lacks precision.
