All categories

2 years ago

1. What's a possible risk when more federal aid is given to cities?

1 answer:

3 0

I think a possible risk when more federal aid is given to cities is C. HIGHER TAXES IN THE STATES.

When federal aid is given, there will be more money for public services. Money that will still be under local control but overseen by the federal government.

I don't think that higher taxes in the cities will be imposed. The reason why federal aid is needed is because the city has less money for their public services. This means that their tax collection may be insufficient or there are lesser number of employed individuals and businesses who pays taxes.

The states will shoulder the additional federal aid given to cities and they compensate it by giving higher taxes in the states.

You might be interested in

Jeff Heun,president of Concrete Always, agrees to construct a concrete cartpath at Dakota Golf Club. Concrete Always enters into

nataly862011 [7]

Answer:

a. $234,000

b. $239,000

Explanation:

a. The transaction price is

= Construction cost + Performance bonus on the time of completion × project complete on time percentage + performance bonus after one week × one week late percentage + performance bonus after two week × two week late percentage

= $200,000 + $40,000 × 0.55 + $30,000 × 0.30 + $20,000 × 0.15

= $200,000 + $22,000 + $9,000 + $3,000

= $234,000

b. The transaction price is

= Construction cost + Performance bonus on the time of completion × project complete on time probability + performance bonus after one week × one week late probability

= $200,000 + $40,000 × 90% + $30,000 × 10%

= $200,000 + $36,000 + $3,000

= $239,000

The after one week is

= $40,000 - $10,000

= $30,000

The after two week is

= $40,000 - $10,000 - $10,000

= $20,000

5 0

3 years ago

Hope Springs makes the bottles of water, puts them into storage, and fills orders as they come in from inventory. This is an exa

svlad2 [7]

The type of supply-chain strategy uses by Hope Spring to fills orders as they come in from inventory is called the pull supply-chain strategy.

The pull supply strategy is a manufacturing strategy that is influenced by consumer's demand because the demand are used to decide the level of procurement, production and distribution of product.

This strategy is very effective to prevent against wastage or over-production since the level of demand for the product determine the level of producing such product.

Therefore, in conclusion, the example of this is known as Pull supply-chain strategy.

Learn more about this here

<em>brainly.com/question/17830486</em>

3 0

2 years ago

"The Price King Auto Mall pays their sales staff by commission. They are paid a percent of the profit the dealership makes on ea

Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

$625

Explanation:

He made a profit of $2500 which is greater than $1500, so he would earn a 25% commmision

25% of $2500 = $625

I hope my answer helps you

4 0

3 years ago

Question 3 The owner of a cemetery plans to offer a perpetual care service for grave sites. The owner estimates that it will cos

den301095 [7]

Answer:

$1,083

Explanation:

Given that,

Cost of providing perpetual care service for grave sites = $130 per year

Interest rate = 12 percent

Therefore, the one-time fee the owner should charge:

= Cost of providing perpetual care service for grave sites ÷ Interest rate

= $130 ÷ 0.12

= $1,083.33 or $1,083

Hence, the one-time fee should the owner charge for the perpetual care service is $1,083.

6 0

2 years ago

Robert Parish Corporation purchased a new machine for its assembly process on January 1, 2014. The cost of this machine was $315

Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

(a) Straight-line depreciation.

depreciation expense per year = ($315,900 - $15,900) / 4 = $75,000

(b) Activity method for 2014 and 2015, assuming that machine usage was 15,000 hours for 2014; 11,710 hours for 2015; 12,150 hours for 2016 and 1,140 hours for 2017.

depreciation expense per unit = $300,000 / 40,000 = $7.50 per unit

depreciation expense 2014 = $7.50 x 15,000 = $112,500

depreciation expense 2015 = $7.50 x 11,710 = $87,825

depreciation expense 2014 = $300,000 x 4/10 = $120,000

depreciation expense 2015 = $300,000 x 3/10 = $90,000

(d) Double-declining-balance.

depreciation expense 2014 = $315,900 x 2 x 1/4 = $157,950

depreciation expense 2015 = $157,950 x 2 x 1/4 = $78,975

depreciation expense 2016 = $78,975 x 2 x 1/4 = $39,487.50

depreciation expense 2017 = $39,487.50 - $15,900 = $23,587.50

6 0

3 years ago