Answer: it shows the level of sovereignty the government enjoyed to rule the people
Explanation:
The popular will is the concept of majority rule in a democracy which is based on the fact that government can only be established due to the majority of votes given to the political party by the electorate in an election. Democracy is said to be a government that allows everybody the right to franchise in an election once such a person has attained the legal age to vote and be voted for in an election. In a democracy the popular will is important because it shows the sovereignty the people has given the government which has allowed them to rule the people till the next election. It is said that, sovereignty belong to the people, this is expressed when the government in power win an election by having the absolute majority of the votes cast by the electorate to becomes the winner in an election.
According to functionalism, men fill instrumental roles, women fill expressive roles, and this arrangement benefits society. Functionalism is when the specific expected role of certain group or people are filled in perfectly according to what is expected. This in turn benefitted the whole community or society.
Answer:
Member check
Explanation:
Member checking is a qualitative technique that is used to establish the truth of the research study’s findings. It also means a process that shows that the findings of a particular research are accurate and truthful.
Member checking also involves the process of getting and sharing the entire findings of the study with the research participants.
Member checking is the foundation to establishing trustworthiness with the participants of the research.
Answer:
Martin will perform better because he spaced out his studying.
Explanation:
Ginny and Martin are both studying for a psychology exam. Ginny organizes her time so that she has the entire day before the eam to read and study. Martin arranges his week so he gets about an hour and a half of study time in each day the week before his excam. Both Ginny and Martin end up studying the same total number of hours. Which of the following will likely be PM true? A. Girwy will perform better because she used the spaced practice technique B. Both will do equally well because they spent the same amount of time studying C. Ginny will perform better because she focused all other energy on one subject matter for an extended period of time D. Martin will remember more information because he spaced out his Martin will perform better because he spaced out his studying.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
