The correct answer is letter A
In this type of situation we can see that there was a type of neglect of the person who wanted a haircut. She let the hairdresser do what she wanted with her hair and it shows that she refrained from the responsibility of having a type of cut or shape that she wanted her hair, and with that it facilitated the hairdresser to make mistakes, because there is no formula to be able to understand what someone wants if the person does not inform what they want. In this way it is easier to blame the hairdresser for the mistake, than to take responsibility for his lack of choice.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, The most important trait of public goods is that they are non exclude-able and nonrivalrous.
Explanation:
Public goods are the goods that are provided by the government of a country for the general public of that country and each and every person of the country can use those goods. The most common examples of public goods are rides in parks, benches, shades of trees, public washrooms, public recreational parks, etc.
The public goods are non exclude-able and nonrivalrous because no one can be excluded from using these goods and the use of these goods by one cannot reduce the availability of it for the others.
Answer:
here are some bad examples/thoughts
Explanation:
If Christ is here then why is there so much bad in the world
If Christ is here, he would be dissapointed in you
If Christ is here, why did he destroy my life?
The tendency for people to see their environment only as it affects them and as it is consistent with their expectations is known as selective perception.
<h3>What is selective perception?</h3>
This is the ability of people to categorize and analyze the stimuli that they are experiencing in the environment that they exist in.
It has to do with how the stimuli affects them and the fact that it is consistent with what they expect.
Read more on selective perception here: brainly.com/question/14314991
#SPJ1
Answer: The judicial branch had supported their position.
Explanation: As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court because they felt that why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it.
The Supreme Court ruled that The Native Americans were “domestic dependent nations,” subject to the United States as a ward to a guardian. The territory was part of the United States but not subject to action by individual states. However, the missionaries encouraged them to stand fast. When the Native Americans read Marshall’s decision, they had honestly believed that the Nation had won the case, that Georgia lacked authority to control their lives and property, and that the courts would protect them.
