Answer:
C. Brazil should produce coffee and export it to France
Explanation:
Since Brazil is the country that has excellent conditions for producing coffee, it should use it in its advantage. The coffee is a highly demanded product on the market, and billions of people use it every day. France on the other hand, doesn't have good conditions for production of coffee, but it is a very large consumer of it, so it has to import large quantities of it. Brazil should use the high demand by France for coffee, produce lot of it, and export it to this country, thus Brazil will get good profit, while France will get the product it wants.
Answer:
Sacred music in the Middle Ages was exclusively vocal. They refused musical instruments. Sacred music was solemn, strict, completely different from secular music. There was no division into musical measures, and no fixed rhythm.
Intuitism limited the use of instruments exclusively to support the singing of words, so that their meaning was well understood by listeners, and the souls of believers were sent to contemplate spiritual objects.
Explanation:
Answer:
Spanish-American War
Explanation:
This treaty ended the Spanish-American war. This treaty was signed on December 10,1898.
The correct answers are A) Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, C) Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and E) Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.
<em>The results of a government </em><u><em>NOT ADHERING</em></u><em> to the rule of law could be the following: Laws change often and there is no standard process for deciding what will become law, Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, and Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens.</em>
The rule of law means that nobody, including the government, is above the law. The rule of law is doing this right by every single member in a society. No exceptions.
So The results of a government <em><u>NOT ADHERING</u></em> to the rule of law could be disastrous for the civic life in a society and the security of its citizens. Laws could change and for any reason, to the convenience of the officials. There would be a tendency for corruptive practices. Laws do not apply basic principles of fairness and morality, it could become the "law of the jungle," or the survivor of the fittest. And finally, Laws allow government officials to behave in any way, without adhering to the same laws as other citizens. This means that the powerful men in power can do whatever the like, and impose their will on people.
Answer:
Inspiring, Motivating, Caring
Explanation:
I would say those are some words to describe her
