In a typical research report, the items that are included in the references section are:
<h3>What is the purpose of
references in research report?</h3>
Generally, a reference is the way of giving credit to the writers from whom you have borrowed words and ideas, so, by citing the work of a particular scholar, you acknowledge and respect the intellectual property rights of that researcher.
As an academic, we can draw on any of the millions of ideas, insights and arguments published by other writers, many of whom have spent years researching and writing. All we need to do is acknowledge their contribution to your assignment.
So, by referencing, this allows you to acknowledge the contribution of other writers and researchers in your work. All of the university assignments that draw on the ideas, words or research of other writers must contain citations.
Read more about references
brainly.com/question/28261265
#SPJ1
Answer:
pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP
Explanation:
A monopsonistic employer in an unorganized (nonunion) labor market will: "pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP"
The above statement is based on the idea that Monopsony is a market situation whereby a single buyer or firm is the only purchaser of a good or service, which in most cases has to do with the purchase of labor.
And given the fact that the firm is the sole purchaser of labor, where there is no labor union, there is a high tendency that such firm or employer pays a wage rate less than labor's marginal revenue productivity.
Answer:
Hundred Days
Explanation:
The period between March 9 and June 16, 1933, when Congress passed 15 major acts to meet the economic crisis of the Depression was called <u>the hundred Days</u>. As we know that the First New Deal began in a whirlwind of legislative action called “The First Hundred Days.” From March through June 1933, at Roosevelt’s behest, Congress passed legislation aimed at addressing the banking crisis, unemployment, and weak industrial performance, among other problems, through an “alphabet soup” of new laws and agencies.
Private Employers.
The Right to know law discusses workers rights to know about dangerous chemicals/substances in the workplace and is overseen by OSHA ..
Answer:
The correct answer is
: Yes, the offer was revoked by Katherine.
Explanation:
Even if Paul replied Katherine with the acceptance to the first offer, he used a different means of communication to do that -<em>e-mail v. mail</em>. In addition, Katherine sent the revoke by mail -<em>as in the initial offer</em>- before Paul sent his e-mail. So, there is enough proof on Katherine's end that she didn't want to proceed with the offer before Paul confirmed his agreement on the terms. In that sense, Katherine did revoke the initial order.
