The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice. The main complaint is that it is not that harsh enough. I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead! Feel free to ask more.
<span>This was the case of "Holt v. Hobbs". In this case, Holt, a practicing Salafi Muslim, claimed that the imposition of facial hair restrictions were an imposition based upon the Religious Land Use and Imprisoned Persons Act. The 9-0 majority found that the prison had not exhausted all available measures for accommodating Mr. Holt and that the grooming policy was an imposition against his religious needs.</span>
False.
the basic purpose of tort law is to provide civil remedies for the invasion of protected interests. Because of intentional tort requires intent, a harmful motive is required.
Answer:
B. there are lawful restrictions on a governments power.
Answer:The Answer is A.
Explanation: I found it on this site http://cyborganthropology.com/Domestic-Public_Dichotomy
