I think it means that his thoughts were worth more than money.
Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
I believe the answer to your question is D.
Answer:
The correct answer for: Risk of harm in social and behavioral sciences generally fall in three categories, which are: Is: 1.- Invasion of privacy. 2.- Breach of confidentiality. 3.- Study procedure.
Explanation:
First of all risk of harm in social and behavioral sciences is a very general phenomenon that is part of the interdisciplinary objects o studies because it has many causes and many perspectives to be analyzed. It is such a complex phenomenon that can be analyzed by many postures and it has so many outcomes also that there has to be an event with the isolation of events or parts to be discussed, analyzed, and solved. Thus, invasion o privacy it's a very basic form in which this phenomenon can be caused or developed. Breach confidentiality also has a very close relation with le last mentioned because the exposure of information after it's gathering will lead to scenarios in which there could be a risk the subjects of study or the researchers can make the study all into this category. Now the last want is a bit complicated because even though it can define the procedure of study it also can be the same effect by revealing this information to the public.
