Like magnets. Idk
Hope this makes sense in any way
The main conflict is Buck fighting against his masters and his development from a tame dog into a wild wolf. This drives the plot because it shows the life of Buck as he is exposed to the harshness of the world from his first taste of abuse to his first life and death dog fight and his being punished for the wildness that is in him to the end where he buckles under the influence of the wild. This shapes Buck's characterization because in the beginning of this story, he is a tame, gentle giant who lived in the south. A pretty soft dog who didn't have anything to worry about. However, this changes from the first time a man hits him and his first dog fight. The conflict is resolved In the end by Buck's dearly loved master being killed. After this, Buck throws the law of the club away, and kills many Indians, those who killed his loved master. After he does this, he goes to run with his wild brothers and caves to his instincts and becomes a wild wolf.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Below is a section from a previous draft of Donovan's argumentative essay. What type of appeal is Donovan making in the underlined sentences? Georgia O'Keeffe became one of the most famous painters of all time by not doing what "the men" of her time expected of her. O'Keeffe had the courage to be creative in the face of constant criticism. If O'Keeffe sat down to take an IQ test today, she might very well draw her answers and end up with a poor score. But she would not care what the results of the test were! Answer choices for the above question A. This is an emotional appeal. B. This is repetition. C. This is an ethical appeal. D. This is a counter argument.
Answer:
D. This is a counter argument.
Explanation:
As we can see in the text shown above, the underlined phrase stands as an objection, a refutation to the argument previously said, which states that if O'Keeffe made a current IQ text, it would have a low score. This type of positioning is called a counter argument.
The counter-argument aims to counter a premise and not hinder its meaning. When the author of the text states that O'Keeffe would not do well in an IQ test, he opposes arguments showing that this would not tarnish the genius she possessed.
The correct answer is filled with emotion.
An absolute phrase is usually set off from the rest of the sentence by using commas. It refers to the subject of the sentence and never contains a finite verb. The absolute phrase <em>filled with emotion </em>is also an appositive phrase, referring to the subject, Tom.
