According to the constitution, state governments have the authority to directly control topics like the legal drinking age, marriage, divorce, and sexual activity.
A state's laws are created and implemented by its state governments, which is a separate administrative body. State governments are used by a number of contemporary nations, including the United States, Australia, and India, to administer to the local needs of an area. Modern countries grant reserved authorities, particular powers, and duties to state governments that are not granted to the federal government.
Typically, state governments are in charge of handling the particular state or region's unique demands and issues. Typically, a state constitution outlines the duties and authority of the state government. In the United States, each of the fifty states has a state constitution that outlines who has authority, how authority is distributed, how policy can be created, what rights the state's residents have, and how elections are held. Due to the fact that states typically deal with more specialized concerns, state constitutions are typically more specific than national ones.
Learn more about state governments here
brainly.com/question/22946246
#SPJ4
Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
<span>his idea is best described as a(n) Theory
In a theory, even though the conveyed idea(s) are based on general <em>facts&principles</em> that already proven before, they're still in an abstract form. There is no experiments or research that conducted to support these ideas in any way. </span>
I believe the answer is: D. performing charitable work for the African American community
United Negro Improvement Association was created in order to improve the quality of lives for African American citizens in united states, which might be stunted due to having to face centuries of slavery, racial segregation, and years of racial discrimination.
One of their main program is providing poor African American students with scholarship to pursue their education.
In this example, john's whistling is serving as a discriminative stimulus.
This procedure, studied by Ivan Pavlov, shows a stimulus ( in this case the action of John's whistling) and a response ( the cattle run to the food trough).
Pavlov studied it with dogs. He realised that when a trainer fed them, dogs salivated. So, he presented the dogs with a "stimulus" ( the sound of a metronome) and when he gave the dogs food. After a few repetitions, when the dog listened to the stimulus, it salivated.
