Answer:
the true cost (opportunity cost) of going trekking is what the amount that you could have earned from your part time job on that day instead of going trekking. If you were planning to to study, then the true cost of trekking with your friend would be the loss of all the potential knowledge that you could have gain from studying.
Explanation:
opportunity cost is the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen.
Answer: False.
Explanation:
False.
This indicates that the two goods are substitute goods, not the complementary goods.
In case of complementary goods, the price of one good is inversely related with the demand for other related good. For example, car and petrol; if the price of petrol increases as a result demand for cars decreases.
In case of substitute goods, the price of one good is directly related with the demand for other related good. For example, tea and coffee; if the price of coffee increases as a result demand for tea increases. So, there is a positive relationship between the price of one good and demand for the other good.
Answer:
a. Revenues - These will increase by $5 million to represent the entire value of the order.
b. Earnings. - Increase by $3 million
Earnings in this case are revenue less the cost of inventory which will be;
= 5 - 2
= $3 million
c. Receivables - Increase by $4 million
The customer paid $1 million upfront which means that they still owe $4 million out of the $5 million. This will go to the receivables account to show that the customer owes the business.
After all resulting adjustments have been completed, the new equilibrium price will less than the initial price and output. The same will happen to the industry output. In each situation in which <span>an increase in product demand occurs in a decreasing-cost industry the result is: </span>the new long-run equilibrium price is lower than the original long-run equilibrium price.