Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Answer: Henardo de Soto
Explanation:
Henardo de Soto was a Spanish explorer southeastern United States. Fun Fact he discovered the Mississippi River in 1541. The Spaniard that explored much of the Southeast of what is today the United States was Hernado de Soto.
Answer:
The answer to your first question is <u>C. Brain Drains</u>
The answer to your second question is <u>B. Low levels of crimes</u>
Explanation:
IF ITS WRONG, IM SORRY :(
Answer:
? can you explain a bit more ?
Explanation: