Answer:
(C) Yes, most companies allow the responsibility to rest with the requester and the receiver of the material requisition slip.
Explanation:
As Kayleigh is looking over a number of material requisition slips from her employees. She has to sign off on each request after reviewing it, which she thinks is a waste of time and effort. Kayleigh believes that having the name of the employee who requested the materials should be enough. Yes, it is very much true and correct because many companies allow the responsibility to rest with the requester and the receiver of the material requisition slip. Some companies do not want that process to become to become much hectic and lengthy for its management as well as workers. If this process is being followed then less time will be taken to complete the overall project and both the time and cost can be saved to make overall project more effective and efficient as well.
The manager should analyze the legal and ethical differences of home country compared to the host country and<u> develop a strategy that is beneficial to the company and does not clash with the ethical and legal parameters of the host country.</u> It is important to analyze each area that may affect the company, such as government, employee, supplier, investor and customer protectionism, and to analyze common ethical, legal and cultural standards for stakeholders and then develop policies and standards that do not negatively influence the country.
Hypernormas are very effective in solving these possible conflicts, as they guide the lowest-level norms to the highest-level ones, which are those related to fundamental principles for humanity. Which is effective to guide management in an international market.
Answer:
c. sells off a major portion of its business to another company.
Explanation:
The corporation that should obtain the approval of the shareholder prior when the business major portion is sell off to the another company as it is very crucial decision taken by the company. It cant be taken without the approval of the shareholder as they are the original investors of the company
So as per the given situation, the option c is correct
So, doing the calculations, Marion's had $700,000-240,000=$460,000-160,000 in expenses = $300,000 x 0.4 income tax=120,000 and so 300,000-120,000=$180,000 net value. Preston's had $700,000-40,000 depreciation=$660,000-160,000 expenses =$500,000 x 0.4 taxes= 200,000 taxes so 500,000-200,000=$300,000 net value. The result is Preston's had less depreciation which provided it with more spendable income.
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
First and foremost, it should be noted that there's a flat tax rate of 21% on the taxable income, therefore the after tax income will be:
= (1 - 21%) × $1 million
= 79% × $1 million
= $790,000
Therefore, the amount of the dividend payment is $790,000 which is given to Leona.
The after tax cash flow from the dividend receipt will be:
= $790,000 - (20% × $790,000)
= $790,000 - (0.2 × $790,000)
= $790,000 - $158,000
= $632,000
Therefore, the total tax by Henly and Leona will then be:
= $210,000 + $158,000
= $368,000.
This is 36.8% (368000/1 million) of the tax rate.
