1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vikentia [17]
3 years ago
8

You can spend $10 for lunch and you would like to purchase two cheeseburgers. When you get to the restaurant, you find out the p

rice for cheeseburger has increased from $5 to $6, so you decide to purchase just one cheeseburger. This is best described as:
Α. the substitution effect of a price change
B. the income effect of a price change
C. a decrease in the buyer's reservation price.
D. an increase in the buyer's reservation price.
Business
1 answer:
nalin [4]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: income effect of a price change.

Explanation: The income effect is known as the effect on real income when price changes, it can however be positive or negative. The income effect expresses the impact of increased purchasing power on consumption.

In this scenario, spending $10 for lunch, and you would like to purchase two cheeseburgers. When you get to the restaurant, you find out the price for cheeseburger has increased from $5 to $6, so you decide to purchase just one cheeseburger, this scenario best illustrates the income effect of a price change.

You might be interested in
During the last half of 2008, the Fed seemed to take "baby steps" in reducing the federal-funds rate target, before finally lowe
emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

Why can't the Fed push the rate any lower than zero?

Real interest rates can be lower than zero, or negative (because inflation rate is higher than interest rate), but nominal interest rates are generally only limited to zero. But during this same time, the European Central Bank actually started paying negative interest rates on money deposits and many European private banks followed. That means that they charged people for having their money on the bank.

Why do you think that the Fed was so seemingly reluctant to push the rate all the way to the floor?

The reason why the Fed was not willing to push the interest rates to zero or even below zero was that by doing so, the US dollar would have depreciated or lost value. In Europe this was done to encourage people to spend their money and not save as much, but in the US that is not really a problem. Generally in the US the problem is that people spend too much and save too little, but on some European countries and Japan, people tend to save too much. For example in Japan the national savings rate fluctuates between 22-40%, while the maximum savings rate in the US has been 10.4% in 1960, it currently is around 7.6%.

4 0
3 years ago
True or false: When units produced are less than units sold, net income under absorption costing will be less than net income co
Oliga [24]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Generally, net income will be the same under absorption costing and variable costing. However, producing fewer units than units sold will decrease the net income under absorption costing. As whatever the variable cost is under the absorption method, fixed manufacturing overhead remains the same that decreases the gross profit and net income. Under the variable costing, the fixed overhead will be calculated as per the units produced. Therefore, the net income will decrease proportionately.

6 0
3 years ago
Fortune, Inc., is preparing its master budget for the first quarter. The company sells a single product at a price of S25 per un
alukav5142 [94]

Answer:

Instructions are below.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Selling price= $25 per unit.

Sales (in units):

January= 45,000

February= 55,000

March= 50,000

The cost of goods sold is $14 per unit.

The gross profit is calculated using the following formula:

Gross profit= selling price - cost of goods sold

January:

Sales= 45,000*25= 1,125,000

COGS= 45,000*14= (630,000)

Gross profit= 525,000

February:

Sales= 55,000*25= 1,375,000

COGS= 55,000*14= (770,000)

Gross profit= 605,000

March:

Sales= 50,000*25= 1,250,000

COGS= 50,000*14= (700,000)

Gross profit= 550,000

5 0
3 years ago
Prior to the write off of a $500 customer account, Athena Company had the following account balances: Accounts receivable $19,60
Effectus [21]

Answer:

Net accounts receivable Before $18,600 and  After $18,600

Explanation:

solution

we know that here

net accounts receivable before write-off  

Accounts Receivable = $19,600  

and Allowance for doubtful debt = $1,000

so Net accounts receivable =  $19,600 - $1,000 =  $18,600

so

Journal Entry for write off is here    

Allowance for doubtful Accounts = $500

Accounts Receivable = $500

and

Net accounts receivable after write off is    

Accounts Receivable= $19,100

and

Allowance for doubtful debt= $500  

so Net accounts receivable = $19,100 - $500

Net accounts receivable = 8,600

so Net accounts receivable Before $18,600 and  After $18,600

6 0
3 years ago
Outdoor luggage inc. makes high-end hard-sided luggage for sports equipment. data concerning three of the company's most popular
Elden [556K]

1-a. The total time available on the plastic injection molding machine is the constraint in the production process. What is the contribution margin per unit of the constrained resources for Ski Guard, Golf Guard and Fishing Guard?

Answer:

We need to need to find the contribution margin for each product.

Contribution Margin per unit = Selling Price per unit - Variable cost per unit

Then we need to find contribution margin per unit of constrained resources with the following formula:

Contribution Margin per unit of constrained resource = \frac{Contribution margin per unit}{Resource needed per unit of product}

Constraint: Time available on plastic injection moulding machine

Ski Guard Golf guard Fishing guard

Selling Price per unit 200 300 255

Less: Variable Cost 60 140 55

Contribution Margin 140 160 200

Processing time per unit (minutes) 2 5 4

Contribution Margin unit of constraint 70 (140/2) 32 (160/5) 50

1-b. Which product would be the most profitable use of this constraint?

Manufacturing the <u>Ski Guard</u> would be the <u>most profitable use</u> of this constraint since it has <u>the maximum contribution margin per unit of constraint, ($70 per unit).</u>

1-c. Which product would be the least profitable use of this constraint?

The <u>Golf Guard</u> would be the least profitable use of this constraint since it has the <u>least contribution margin per unit of constraint, at $32 per unit</u>.

2a. A severe shortage of plastic pellets has required the company to cut back its production so much that the plastic injection molding machine is no longer the bottleneck. Instead, the constraint is the total available pounds of plastic pellets. What is contribution margin per unit of the constrained resources for Ski Guard, Golf Guard and Fishing Guard?

We need to need to find the contribution margin for each product.

Contribution Margin per unit = Selling Price per unit - Variable cost per unit

Then we need to find contribution margin per unit of constrained resources with the following formula:

Contribution Margin per unit of constrained resource = \frac{Contribution margin per unit}{Resource needed per unit of product}

Constraint: Pounds of plastic pellets

Ski Guard Golf guard Fishing guard

Selling Price per unit 200 300 255

Less: Variable Cost 60 140 55

Contribution Margin 140 160 200

Plastic pellets per unit (pounds) 7 4 8

Contribution Margin per pound 20 (140/7) 40 (160/4) 25 (200/8)

2-b. Which product would be the most profitable use of this constraint?

The <u>Golf Guard</u> would be the <u>most profitable use</u> of this constraint since it has <u>the maximum contribution margin per unit of constraint, ($40 per unit).</u>

2-c. Which product would be the least profitable use of this constraint?

The <u>SkiGuard</u>, with a contribution margin of <u>$20 per pound</u> of plastic would be the <u>least profitable</u> use of this constraint.

3. Which product has the largest unit contribution margin?

Answer : The <u>fishing guard</u> has the <u>largest per unit contribution margin </u>at <u>$200.</u>

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In b2c sales the salesperson does not spend a great deal of their time:
    12·1 answer
  • McMurphy Corporation produces a part that is used in the manufacture of one of its products. The costs associated with the produ
    13·1 answer
  • Which function would you use to change the appearance of data in a cell from decimal to percentage?
    15·2 answers
  • Nordstrom, an upscale department store, has a well-known reputation for going the extra mile to serve its customers. This reputa
    12·1 answer
  • What is the last step in creating a budget
    7·1 answer
  • What are the sources and types of the principal agent problem?
    13·1 answer
  • Radovilsky Manufacturing Company, in Hayward, California, makes flashing lights for toys. The company operates its production fa
    10·1 answer
  • I forgot my user name and password. Can u help me?
    10·2 answers
  • Hero Manufacturing has 5 million shares of common stock outstanding. The current share price is $84 and the book value per share
    13·1 answer
  • A firm has a marginal cost of $20 and charges a price of $40. the lerner index for this firm is? 0.33. 0.20. 0.50. 0.75.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!