Answer: Option B
Explanation: In simple words, geographic departmentalization refers to the process under which an organisation separates its market operations on the basis of the geography such as country, state or district etc.
In the given case, company has separated its operations on the basis of different preferences of different countries.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is B .
Answer:
u can use quillbot.com
Explanation:
it makes a few sentences into a lot giving a whole article on something off of a few sentences u write
Answer:
Gross Domestic Product
= $500
<em>GDP is the final value of goods and services. The haircut is valued at $500 so is GDP. </em>
Net National Product:
= GDP - Depreciation
= 500 - 80
= $420
National Income
= $420
<em>This is the income that a resident of the country earns and $420 is what Barry earned in net income.</em>
Personal Income
= National income - Retained earnings
= 420 - 120 - 50
= $250
Disposable Personal Income (Dollars)
= Personal income - income taxes
= 250 - 90
= $160
Answer:
a.Company A has a lower return on assets (ROA).
c.Company A has a lower times interest earned (TIE) ratio.
That is options a and c
Explanation:
For company A to have high debt ratio means it has a higher debt which will reduce earnings. Company A's earnings will be less than Company B's.
ROA= Net income/Total assets
Since Company A's income is less than Company B's ROA for Company A will be less than that for Company B.
TIE = Earnings before Interest and Tax/Interest
Due to higher debt of company A it's interest will be higher resulting in low TIE.
Answer:
D) is 20% above expectations.
Explanation:
The Augusta Division was supposed to earn a net profit of $1,000,000 (= $2,000,000 - $1,000,000). Since the division's manager and his/her team were able to cut reduce fixed costs to $900,000 and increase contribution margin to $2,100,000 (either by increasing selling price or reducing variable costs), then the division earned a net profit of $1,200,000 (= $2,100,000 - $900,000). This net profit is 20% higher than expected, therefore the manager's (and his/her team's) overall performance was 20% above expectations.
