Answer:
More convinced that the evidence was insufficient.
Explanation:
According to the group polarization hypothesis, after the jurors deliberated, they would be<em> more convinced that the evidence was insufficient. </em>The group polarization hypothesis states that group decisions are more extreme than the initial thought of individual members. In this case, the jurors individually believe that there is insufficient evidence to convict the defendant. After deliberations, and due to the group polarization hypothesis they will be<em> more</em> convinced that the evidence is insufficient.
Answer:
Tendency towards Initiative
Explanation:
Eriksson's theory proved the relationship between a child's ability to take initiative and the parents input and interaction. A child whose parent is supportive and gives the child room for exploring, will no doubt develop self confidence in mastering the task of taking initiative and accomplishing goals
to uphold the laws of the jurisdiction, provide patrol, and investigate local crimes.
___+___+___+___+___+___+___+___+___+___+___+___+___+___+___+_
Answer:
The answer is D. They get 80 percent of PAC contributions.
Explanation:
Political Action Committees are campaign collectors. They pool funds from their members and donate these funds to campaign for or against a particular candidate.
PACs usually give an overwhelming proportion of their campaign funds (about 80percent of their contributions) to incumbents. This, they believe is good investment because of the positive re-election rates these incumbents have.
