<span>Reduction in a nation's labor force would long-run aggregate supply curse to the left, representing a reduction in labor. This would tend to drive up labor costs over time. Presumably, the demand curve would remain static in the short-term.
However, such a reduction would also impact the nation's consumption and thereby reduce the demand for products. This would in turn drive a decreased demand for labor (leftward shift) and apply downward pressure to wages.
The answer to this depends on whether the questions is regarding short-term, medium-term or long-term labor supply/demand curve.</span>
<span>In function of the good service that must have in public transport and the welfare for the citizens another suggestion and possible resource that can be taken in this respect is to combine those initial ideas in function of the efficiency that these decisions provide. Reduce the price, you can decrease the income for maintenance, therefore you can freeze for time. Increasing the price may lead to rejection by users and an impact on their economy, however, it must be increased at a reasonable time. The monthly and annual passes are part of a balanced idea. In view of the acceptance of users there is more demand therefore the third idea must be complemented and offer passages of reduction of prices per trip that do not affect both economies of companies and users.</span>
The diminishing returns to specialization suggests that it is worthwhile for companies to specialize until that point where the resulting gains from trade are outweighed by diminishing returns.
<h3>What is the
diminishing returns to specialization?</h3>
This diminishing return happens when the resources can move freely from the production of one good to another within a country.
However, its suggests that it is worthwhile for companies to specialize until that point where the resulting gains from trade are outweighed by diminishing returns.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about diminishing returns
<em>brainly.com/question/19070161</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. Bastiaan Vanacker wins a libel suit , Sebastian Van Akker loses.
Explanation:
Libel is where a defamatory statement has been published and that statement is false, this will result in the person able to claim libel charges.
This means that if information about someone is publicised (specially a private figure) for any criminal act and which could lead to damage that person's reputation seriously without any proper evidence or even false evidence then this would become ground for a libel case.
Such as in this case where a journalist reported that Bastiaan Vanacker was arrested for indecent exposure even though this was not really the case. As confirmed through the police report which the journalist had misread. This libel suit filed by Bastiaan Vanacker would be won, as his reputation has been damaged to the falsely alleged report published in the newspaper.
However, in the case of Sebastian Van Akker, who had actually committed the crime and no information was mentioned about him in the newspaper, will lose the libel suit filed. This is due to the fact that he was not defamed for any act which he himself had not conducted.
The correct answer of the given statement above would be TRUE. It is true that estimated <span>payments are often used by individuals who are self-employed, have investments, or other income where employer withholding is not offered. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for.</span>
