For Joe, wearing sunglasses is controlled by avoiding blinding sunshine, whereas for Bill, wearing sunglasses is sustained by avoiding blinding sunlight.
<h3>The psychological aspect of wearing sunglasses</h3>
- There are particular periods of the day and places where there is a higher risk of sun-related eye injury. Being near water, snow, or a moving vehicle on a sunny day is like receiving a double dose of ultraviolet light. These surfaces can reflect light into the eyes.
- It also matters how big the sunglasses are. The better, the bigger. Researchers from Switzerland discovered in 2018 that larger sunglasses provided greater UV protection than smaller ones and that UV-blocking goggles provided the most comprehensive shield.
- The body's circadian clocks, which are involved in controlling sleep, food, and many other processes, have been proven to be set by light-sensing photoreceptors in the eye.
To learn more about Sunglasses refer to:
brainly.com/question/4617917
#SPJ4
Answer:
I guess it's b but I'm thinking A
The power of Government should be divided
Answer:
Number 1 and 2 are correct. Number 3 is "yes". Number 4 is "yes". Number 5 is "no". Number 6 is "no". Number 7 is "yes". Number 8 is "no".
Explanation:
Number one isn't fair because the juvenile wouldn't know what to say and would be confused about what's happening or going to happen because they didn't have enough time to prepare. Number 2 isn't fair because she might say something that she didn't know she was/wasn't supposed to say that the lawyer would have told her. Number 3 is fair because they aren't supposed to lie in court and the judge needs to know what happened to know how much trouble the person gets and who gets it. Number 4 is fair because since the person is underage and doesn't have enough money to buy a lawyer, the court should assign one to the juvenile. Number 5 is no because the judge or the person going against the juvenile could say something that never happened or never been said at the hearing. Number 6 is no because there's nothing against the juvenile about what happened and he/she could be innocent. Number 7 is yes because the court needs all the evidence and proof about what happened so the judge knows what to do. Number 8 is no because the parents might not be able to make it because they might forget the date of the hearing and they need writing for when the date is and where the hearing is, incase they forgot. I really hope i helped.