Answer:
(0, 6)
Step-by-step explanation:
Point T is at (3, 4), and three units to the left would be (0, 4). They then tell us to go two points up, which would change the ordered pair to (0, 6).
I hope this was helpful! Have a lovely day! :D
Answer:
3/4,3/4,3/4,3/4,1,1,2,11/2,11/2,11/4,11/4
Step-by-step explanation:
we just arrange the number from the smallest to bigger
The question reminds you of all the tools you need:
It says ...
"Opposite angles are equal."
So the upper right angle is x+40 just like the bottom left,
and the bottom right angle is 3x+20 just like the upper left.
And it says ...
"The sum of all angles is 360°."
You know what each of the four angles is, so you can addum all up,
set the sum equal to 360, find out what number ' x ' is, and then
use that to find the size of every angle.
Answer:
h(8q²-2q) = 56q² -10q
k(2q²+3q) = 16q² +31q
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Replace x in the function definition with the function's argument, then simplify.
h(x) = 7x +4q
h(8q² -2q) = 7(8q² -2q) +4q = 56q² -14q +4q = 56q² -10q
__
2. Same as the first problem.
k(x) = 8x +7q
k(2q² +3q) = 8(2q² +3q) +7q = 16q² +24q +7q = 16q² +31q
_____
Comment on the problem
In each case, the function definition says the function is not a function of q; it is only a function of x. It is h(x), not h(x, q). Thus the "q" in the function definition should be considered to be a literal not to be affected by any value x may have. It could be considered another way to write z, for example. In that case, the function would evaluate to ...
h(8q² -2q) = 56q² -14q +4z
and replacing q with some value (say, 2) would give 196+4z, a value that still has z as a separate entity.
In short, I believe the offered answers are misleading with respect to how you would treat function definitions in the real world.
Step-by-step explanation:
6/5 this is the answer hopes this help
