answer:
you need the difference? look below.
explanation:
<h3><em>exhilaration</em>: </h3>
<u>noun</u>
- the act of enlivening the spirits
- the act of making glad or cheerful
- a gladdening
- the state of being enlivened, cheerful or exhilarated
<u>related terms</u>
- exhilarate
- hilarious
- hilary
<h3><em>delight</em>:</h3>
<u>noun</u>
<u>derived terms</u>
<u>verb</u>
- to give delight to
- to affect with great pleasure
- to please highly
<u>derived terms</u>
<u>related terms</u>
- delicacy
- delicate
- delicatessen
- delicious
<u>credits</u>
The correct answer is "Personality Style".
Personality style refers to an individual's behavioral pattern and personality traits that makes up a person's behavior or personality. Because of Judith's personality style, she is unable to cope up with her illness. Personality Styles affects the person's reactions and interactions towards events and things.
The answer to the question above is FIELDWORK. From the term itself, the work involves in the "field" or in the actual environment wherein the researcher him or herself immerses in the natural environment in order to accomplish a given work or task. This already involves participant observation since the researcher witnesses the actual behavior of the participants in the field.
<span>The correct answer is partial reinforcement<span>.
Partial reinforcement refers to a reinforcement schedule, wherein a behavior is reinforced sometimes rather than all the time. Research studies indictae that partial reinforcement is a powerful tool in shaping and maintaining behavior. In this instance, where John sometimes rewards his daughter for excusing herself, he is using a partial reinforcement schedule.</span></span>
Answer:
Collaborative inhibition.
Explanation:
As the exercise suggests, collaborative inhibition happens when, for example, recalling items together, the retrieval strategies used by individual members of the group disrupt those used by others. Therefore, this phenomenon happens when a group of individuals who are together remember less information than the same quantity of individuals would remember if they worked alone. For example, if a group of 4 students had to remember the assigment in full detail, if collaborative inhibition happens, they would disrupt the information among themselves making the same 4 students, separated, more capable of remembering the information.