All categories

3 years ago

My friend need help can u help her

Mathematics

1 answer:

galina1969 [7]3 years ago

3 0

Since 1/4 = 2/8, we know that there will be enough paint for a bookshelf because 4/8 + 2/8 = 6/8 (less than 7/8)

You might be interested in

Find the least common multiple of 12 and 18?

Evgesh-ka [11]

36 is the correct answer

8 0

3 years ago

Explain how to write 3*3/8 as the product of a whole number and a unit fraction

Lady_Fox [76]

9/8 because you multiply 3 × 3 and leave the denominator the same

4 0

3 years ago

Find the area of each figure

kotegsom [21]

8x10 = 80
4x4 = 16
2x4 divided 2 = 4
80+16+ 4 = 100

5 0

3 years ago

Please respond asap! If its right i'll mark brainliest

svp [43]

Answer:

Yermin

Step-by-step explanation:

The square route of 0.5 is around 0.7.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The USDA conducted tests for salmonella in produce grown in California. In an independent sample of 252 cultures obtained from w

Marat540 [252]

Answer:

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The first sample size is $n_1 = 252$

The number that tested positive is $k_1 = 18$

The second sample size is $n_2 = 476$

The number that tested positive is $k_2 = 20$

The level of significance is $\alpha = 0.01$

Generally the first sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _1 = \frac{k_1 }{ n_1 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = \frac{18 }{ 252 }$

=> $\^ p _1 = 0.071$

Generally the second sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$\^ p _2 = \frac{k_2 }{ n_2 }$

=> $\^ p _2 = \frac{20 }{ 476}$

=> $\^ p _2 = 0.042$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 - p_2 = 0$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 - p_2 \ne 0$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented

$z = \frac{ \^ p_1 - \^ p_2 - ( p_ 1 - p_2 )}{ \sqrt{\frac{\^ p_1 (1-\^ p_1)}{ n_1 } + \frac{\^ p_2 (1-\^ p_2)}{ n_2 } } }$

=> $z = \frac{ 0.071 - 0.042 - 0 }{ \sqrt{\frac{0.071 (1-0.071)}{ 252 } + \frac{0.042 (1-\^ 0.042)}{ 476 } } }$

=> $z = 1.56$

From the z table the area under the normal curve to the right corresponding to 1.56 is

$P(Z > 1.56 ) =0.05938$

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = 2 * P(Z > 1.56 )$

=> $p-value = 2 * 0.05938$

=> $p-value = 0.1188$

From the value obtained we see that $p-value > \alpha$ hence

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is

There no sufficient evidence to show that the proportion of salmonella in the region’s water differs from the proportion of salmonella in the region’s wildlife

5 0

3 years ago