Answer:
The act of inflciting bodily harm to the woman is a crime under "actus reus".
But there is no intentional crime committed under "mens rea".
So, the act doesn't qualify as a crime.
Explanation:
In criminal law,<u> "actus reus" is when a person physically harms another person</u> along with <u>"mens rea" which is the mental intention of doing the crime and planning it</u>. That means that an act can be considered a crime only when the actus reus and mens rea are hand-in-hand.
In the given scenario, Joseph's act of slamming his hand on the table is the result of his anger on being served a non-vegetarian dish even though he is a vegan. And this resulted in the bodily harm of the woman nearby. And this act of inflicting bodily harm to another person is not an intentional act, for Joseph did not pre-plan it. So, we can safely say that <u>the action does not constitute a criminal act.
</u>
Answer: they solve resolutions by betraying the people of america
Explanation:
Answer:
meeeeeeeehwjjwhqkqhkqjqkqjjq
Lord Farquad settles for a good nights rest
Answer:Police brutality or police violence, is legally defined as a civil rights violation where officers exercise undue or excessive force against a civilian. This includes, but is not limited to, physical or verbal harassment, physical or mental injury, property damage, and death
Explanation: