1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisabon 2012 [21]
3 years ago
5

can u help me? wut is a good idea for a new amendment how would it benefit people? PLZ HELP WILL GIVE bRaiNLESt if two pEoPLe an

swer. ;-;
Law
1 answer:
icang [17]3 years ago
7 0
Instead of the “right to bear arms”, Americans should have the right to have a professional, well-trained police force that puts the wellbeing of the populace first, not the wellbeing of the police officer. Other developed countries train their cops for years (America: mere months) and teach them de-escalation techniques, instead of feeding them with paranoia and instructing them at length to shoot to kill.
You might be interested in
Article 3 of the Constitution outlines the
MrRa [10]
It is B. Military Court
3 0
3 years ago
Under California law, any person seeking relief for a breach of contract must do so within the time limits of the:
Mice21 [21]

Answer:

action for cause occurring, which is limited to four years.

5 0
3 years ago
Should officers always arrive on a scene with their lights and sirens on to warn the public a crime may be in progress?
lawyer [7]

Answer:

no

Explanation:

this will help the criminals to be alert of officers

5 0
2 years ago
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
with reference to the company act in Kenya ,describe the capacity of a company to enter into a binding contract.​
zysi [14]

Answer:

To enter into a binding contract, you have to be show that the presentation for the contract is made in a well label manner

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP
    9·1 answer
  • What dose the Fourth Amendment require the police to do?
    7·2 answers
  • Looking at the response vehicle pictured above explain two options you have in order to adobe by the move over law
    5·1 answer
  • What force would a baseball exert if gravity pulls it down and its mass is 8 kg?​
    11·1 answer
  • The average American credit card debt is about $15000, if you make monthly payments of $350, with annual interest rate 16%, how
    7·1 answer
  • A example of a question that is not leading
    13·2 answers
  • The agreement providing security in real property is a(n): __________
    7·1 answer
  • Julian entered the U.S. in 2002 and was arrested for human trafficking in 2004. He served 10 years in prison, and returned to hi
    13·1 answer
  • Is it illegal to record a conversation without the other person knowing
    11·1 answer
  • What US Supreme Court case decided that the death penalty itself did NOT violate the Constitution?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!