What is -2y + 10 + 2y - 8 simplifield?

A conjecture and the two-column proof used to prove the conjecture are shown.

aliina [53]

Answer: the statements and resons, from the given bench, that fill in the blank are shown in italic and bold in this table:

Statement Reason

1. K is the midpoint of segment JL Given

2. segment JK ≅ segment KL Definition of midpoint

3. L is the midpoint of segment KM Given

4. segment KL ≅ segment LM Definition of midpoint

5. segment JK ≅ segment LM Transitive Property of

Congruence

Explanation:

1. First blank: you must indicate the reason of the statement "segment JK ≅ segment KL". Since you it is given that K is the midpoint of segment JL, the statement follows from the very Definition of midpoint.

2. Second blank: you must add a given statement. The other given statement is segment KL ≅ segment LM .

3. Third blank: you must indicate the statement that corresponds to the definition of midpoint. That is segment KL ≅ segment LM .

4. Fourth and fith blanks: you must indicate the statement and reason necessary to conclude with the proof. Since, you have already proved that segment JK ≅ segment KL and segment KL ≅ segment LM it is by the transitive property of congruence that segment JK ≅ segment LM.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A local police chief claims that 31% of all drug-related arrests are never prosecuted. A sample of 500 arrests shows that 27% of

Elis [28]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.27 -0.31}{\sqrt{\frac{0.31(1-0.31)}{500}}}=-1.933$

$p_v =P(Z$

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted is not significanlty less than 0.31.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=500 represent the random sample taken

X represent the number of arrests that were not prosecuted.

$\hat p=0.27$ estimated proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted

$p_o=0.31$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.02$ represent the significance level

Confidence=98% or 0.98

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is less than 0.31.:

Null hypothesis: $p\geq 0.31$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.31$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

3) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.27 -0.31}{\sqrt{\frac{0.31(1-0.31)}{500}}}=-1.933$

4) Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.02$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z$

If we compare the p value obtained and the significance level given $\alpha=0.02$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 2% of significance the proportion of arrests that were not prosecuted is not significanlty less than 0.31.

3 0

3 years ago

If O N = 8 x − 8 , L M = 7 x + 4 , N M = x − 5 , and O L = 3 y − 6 , find the values of x and y for which LMNO must be a paralle

posledela

Answer:

$x=12\\y=\frac{13}{3}$