All categories

3 years ago

A portfolio with a beta of 1.26

Business

1 answer:

Vanyuwa [196]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The answer is C: is considerably more risky than the overall market.

Explanation:

The beta of a portfolio is the weighted sum of the individual asset betas, According to the proportions of the investments in the portfolio. A beta of “1” indicates that its volatility is like the benchmarks. A number higher than “1” indicates more volatility, while lower numbers indicate more price stability. Diversification can help make your portfolios less volatile, allowing you to see steady growth without seeing wild swings in the value of your savings.

A zero-beta portfolio is a portfolio constructed to have zero systematic risk or, in other words, a beta of zero. A zero-beta portfolio would have the same expected return as the risk-free rate.

Investors can determine the volatility of their whole portfolios by examining the beta of each holding. The calculation is simply a matter of adding up the beta for each stock and adjusting according to how much of each you own (weighted average).

In this case, the answer is: is considerably more risky than the overall market. A beta of 1,26 is 126% more risky than a free risk option, and 26% more risky than the overall market. It depends on the investor's resilience to risk whether the difference with the overall market is considerable or not.

You might be interested in

POSSIBLE POINTS:

77julia77 [94]

Answer:

Bob must use $4,000 newspaper ads in two numbers

Explanation:

As given in the question -

Total number of people affected by $5,000 TV ad $= 250$

Total number of people affected by two $5,000 TV ad $= 2* 250 = 500$

Total number of people affected by $5,000 TV ad $= 280$

Total number of people affected by two $5,000 TV ad $= 2* 280 = 560$

Hence, more number of people are affected by two news paper adds of $4,000

8 0

3 years ago

Selected transactions for A. Mane, an interior decorator, in her first month of business, are as follows.

Verizon [17]

Answer:

Please see below

Explanation:

Jan 2.

Dr Cash $13,100

Cr Owner equity $13,100

(Being owner's capital contribution to the business in form of cash)

Jan 3.

Dr Vehicle $3,930

Cr Cash. $3,930

(To record the purchase of used car in form of cash)

Jan 9

Dr Supplies. $655

Cr. Accounts payable $655

(To record supplies purchased on account )

Jan 16

Dr Account receivable $3,144

Cr Revenue $3,144

(Being the record of revenue earned on credit)

Jan 16

Dr Advertising expenses $459

Cr Cash $459

(Being the record of advertising expenses paid in cash)

Jan 20

Dr Cash. $917

Cr Account receivable $917

(Being the record of partial collection receivables)

Jan 23

Dr Account payables $393

Cr Cash $393

(Being the record of payment made to creditors)

Jan 28

Dr. Owner equity $1,310

Cr. Cash $1,310

(To record owner's withdrawal of capital in form of cash)

4 0

3 years ago

At the beginning of the year, Smith Company budgeted overhead of $129,600 as well as 13,500 direct labor hours. During the year,

andre [41]

Answer:

Part 1

$9.60

Part 2

$11,129

Part 3

Journal 1

Debit : Overheads $172,500

Credit : Equipment lease $ 6,800

Credit : Depreciation on building 19,340

Credit : Indirect labor 90,400

Credit : Utilities 14,560

Credit : Other overhead 41,400

<em>Being overheads incurred</em>

Journal 2

Debit : Work In Process $173,760

Credit : Overheads $173,760

<em>Being overheads applied</em>

Part 4

under-applied overheads is $1,260

Part 5

$636,860

Explanation:

Overhead rate = Budgeted Overheads ÷ Budgeted Activity

= $129,600 ÷ 13,500

= $9.60

Total cost (Job K456) = $2,750 + $5,355 + $3,024 = $11,129

Actual Overheads = $ 6,800 + $19,340 + $90,400 + $14,560 + $41,400 = $172,500

Applied overheads = 18,100 x $9.60 = $173,760

Since, Actual Overheads < Applied overheads, overheads have been under-applied. Amount of under-applied overheads is $1,260 ($173,760 - $172,500)

Under-applied overheads are added to cost of goods sold. Therefore, adjusted cost of goods sold will be $636,860 ($635,600 + $1,260)

7 0

3 years ago

You are contemplating adding direct selling activities to your existing bricks-and-mortar retail business to increase sales. You

Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

It may be more expensive and time-consuming than using an intermediary

Explanation:

Direct selling makes it hard to reach new customers and also entails spending an extensive time in trying to convince prospective customers before sales is made. Sadly, in some situations, some prospects do not buy in on the intended product and thus, no sale is made and time wasted.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Item 6Item 6 Suppose that the firm's only variable input is labor. When 50 workers are used, the average product of labor is 50

Kipish [7]

Answer:

$1.07

Explanation:

The marginal cost measures the change in total cost of adding on more worker divided by the change in product for this additional worker (marginal product of labor). When adding one more worker, costs will increase by $80 (wage rate), while product will increase by 75. Therefore, the marginal cost is:

$MC=\frac{80}{75}\\MC=\$1.07$

The marginal cost is $1.07.

3 0

3 years ago