Explanation:
Primary Source. The evidence that gives this away is that it is a fragment of a stone dated back to 232 B.C.
The author of this artifact was Asoka. The Mauryan Leader.
The purpose of creating this artifact was to assert Asoka's Buddhism and support his desire to spread dharma.
Evidence that makes me think this is that the tenets have Buddhism engraved them meaning that they had some sort of meaning to the leader.
Something that we have today that is similar to Asoka's rock pillars are edicts?
I hope this helps you out. I wasn't too sure about the last question though.
Answer:
Explanation:
A D and C
Your welcome brainly will be greatly appericated.
Answer:
The objects must be surrounded by air or water. Two objects at different temperatures are touching one another. Two objects at different temperatures are located close to one another.
Explanation:
Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.