11g greater than 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Interest earned at 3.9 percent rate is $31.2
Interest earned at 2 percent rate is $5.8
Step-by-step explanation:
A = P(1 + rt)
Where 'A' is the amount, 'r' is the rate and 't' is the time in years
When;
P = $1200
r = 3.9%
t =
years
Then,
A = $1200(1 + 0.039(
))
A = $1200 + $31.2 = $1231.2
Interest = Amount - Principal
Interest earned at 3.9 percent rate is $1231.2 - $1200 = $31.2
When;
P = $580
r = 2%
t =
years
Then,
A = $580(1 + 0.02(
))
A = $580 + $5.8 = $585.8
Interest earned = Amount - Principal
Interest earned at 2 percent rate = $585.8 - $580 = $5.8
Answer:
if u have any doubts feel free to ask :)
Step-by-step explanation:
Sum of ratio : 9 + 7 + 4 = 20
a)
Adele share :

b)
Barbara share :

Collette share :

c)
$ €
1.125 1
306 x
[cross multiply]

x = €272
Adele receives = €272
d)
Apple Cost
1 kg 2.69
5 kg y
y = 2.69 x 5 = $13.45
Cost of 5kg of apples = $13.45
Cost of 3 kg bananas = 17.56 - 13.45 = $4.11
Banana Cost
3kg 4.11
1 kg z

z = $1.37
Cost per kilogram of banana = $1.37
e) Collette share = $136
Half of it on clothes = (1/2) x 136 = $68
(1/5) of her share on books = (1/5) x 136 = 27.20
Balance amount with her = 136 - 27.20 - 68 = $ 40.80
Answer
5x-3
Step-by-step by explanation
3x-4+2x+1
3x+2x is 5x
-4+1 is -3
5x-3
Answer:
The answer would be that this graph is NOT a proportional relationship.
La respuesta sería que este gráfico NO es una relación proporcional.
Step-by-step explanation:
The reason why this graph makes no relationship is because a relationship needs to be constantly equivalent to the past fraction. But would 2 be equal to 5 and 4 be equal to 10? Nope, that is why it is not a proportional relationship.
La razón por la cual este gráfico no tiene relación es porque una relación debe ser constantemente equivalente a la fracción pasada. ¿Pero sería 2 igual a 5 y 4 igual a 10? No, por eso no es una relación proporcional.