Answer:
State law is the body of laws for a state, but the rule of law is a principle.
Explanation:
The laws of a state are about the individuals laws each state can have in U.S. regarding some matters. While rule of law is a principle that highlights the sovereign of the law, which means all people, institutions and the government are under it. A constitutional theorist called Dicey wrote the rule of law should follow: “equality before law; presumption of innocence unless proven guilty and primacy of rights over Constitution”.
<span>More than 20 million. The true growth of cities in the United States along with nature of its democratic rule led to a massive surplus in immigration during this span of time. Many of these immigrants were European in nature. One such example to demonstrate the massive surplus would be the city of New York, which was predominately foreign based around the year 1900.</span>
Judge Jones is using legal realism school of jurisprudence.
The philosophical school, historical school, realist school, sociological school, and analytical school are the five schools of jurisprudence.
Legal realism is a theory according to which public policy and prevailing social interests are the sources of all law. In accordance with this view, judges decide cases by taking into account social concerns and public policy in addition to abstract norms.
Legal realism is a kind of jurisprudence that places more emphasis on the law's application in daily life than it does in books. To this purpose, it focused primarily on the acts of judges and the variables that affected judicial decision-making processes.
To learn more about legal realism here
brainly.com/question/14482497
#SPJ4
<span>Many states restricted British imports, but they did not all impose the same duties, or taxes, on foreign goods. The British took their goods to the states with the lowest taxes. From there they moved those products to the other states. The states tried to prevent the British from exploiting the different trade laws by levying tariffs on British goods that crossed state lines. The Congress could not address the problem because it had no power to regulate commerce. Each state was beginning to act independently, which threatened the unity of the new nation.</span>
