Answer:
answer is C: she admires and respect his contribution as a veteran I took the test as well ;p;
person above why you say no? :T
At now, girls weren't viewed as capable of completing spy activities. The most vital reasoning we will create to support this excerpt is that ladies weren't viewed as capable of completing spy activities.
Within the passage, we tend to see that Elizabeth van Lew was ready to walk round the hospital and seek advice from the prisoners. If van Lew had been a person, it's unlikely she would are allowed to be therefore getting ready for the troopers. However, her alibi was plausible (women were terribly concerned about spy activities) and nobody suspected she can be a spy attributable to her gender.
To learn more about Van lew, visit here
brainly.com/question/28082764
#SPJ4
Answer:
conflict is a standard part of our everyday lives. considering nobody perspectives matters in the exact same manner, disagreement will most certainly occur at some point in time. conflict is genuinely a distinction of opinion and is considered to be a regular part of our normal lives. There are several different types of conflict and not all of them are considered to be bad. There are many reasons for conflict, the different sorts of conflict, and barriers to conflict. just as there are disadvantages to conflict, there are also numerous advantages. in order to avoid getting into conflicts you could do things differently.
for instance, if you are at work and walk by someone’s desk and accidently knock their pen at the floor. unexpectedly, the character lashes out and starts to curse at you. knowing that this is not regular for your coworker, it would be safe to expect that they may be under some form of stress or have other things on their mind. by knowing this, it will become easier to reply in a more responsible, tempered, and suitable, manner. sometimes their ego can end up a reason for struggle as well. There may also come a time when a person is wrong about some thing or they'll have made a mistake but they do not want to admit it. due to the fact they have got this sort of excessive ego, they may turn out to be self-protective of their state of affairs, therefore causing conflict because they refuse to admit they have been incorrect. instead they will choose to become persistent in standing their ground, whether they may be right or wrong.
during communication, if the intended goals are not clearly identified, there may be a more possibility for errors and it could further irritate a situation, causing conflict. because each individual is different there are bound to be clashes within certain personality types. for instance, if someone prefers to discuss everything in detail and the other person prefers to get straight to the point then they could have a character conflict due to the fact they aren't seeing things eye-to-eye. they'll view the other person as being incompetent or irresponsible at the same time as the other person starts arguing.
conflict is inevitable in a workplace. it is a reality in every work environment through bringing people from diverse backgrounds together. even as people continue to work in teams while being concerned about the manner they are treated by their work team individuals, disagreements will usually arise to create conflicts in the workplaces.
Explanation: there you go
Answer:
I think Esperanza did this because she was too embarrassed and already too overwhelmed by emotions to show which is her house, “And since I am shy, I don’t say anything, just hold out my hand with the letter.” (Cisneros 44) Unfortunately, since Esperanza admitted that the house next to the canteen is hers, this came with the consequence of Sister Superior not believing in the comment in the note since this means she doesn't need to walk far to get home.
Explanation:
Answer:
In no way was the idea of "separate but equal" consistent with the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment, which basically establishes equal rights between African Americans and whites in the country, and admits the citizenship of black people.
The racist governments in the south of the country sought a mechanism to, without manifestly contravening this amendment, segregate the African American population and separate it from the white population. To do this, they sought to comply with the rights established in the Constitution, but through different services from those of whites, and of much lower quality.
Thus, with the complicity of the judicial systems, they violated the principle of equality of the Constitution, protecting themselves in an alleged legality of the "separate but equal" system.
