The answer is a. hope this helps
Answer: Are you in 6th grade? :0 i just learned ancient civilizations, it's A, by the way
Explanation: They wanted durable currencies that wouldn't break because it would be difficult to start trade and purchase the goods, and if they did break, they'd just be losing money, technically.
The purpose of examples are to help your teacher reinforce, personalize, and clarify ideas so these<u> are all correct. </u>
<h3>Purpose of examples </h3>
- They clarify the idea by giving a scenario where the idea is applied.
- They reinforce the idea by relating it to a scenario that allows easy remembrance.
They also personalize ideas when they relate the scenario to a relevant event that allows for the listeners to understand the idea better.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on clarifying ideas at brainly.com/question/2224789.
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
