The correct answer is D. - JUMPING TO Conclusions
Please mark brainliest
Answer:
Indentured servitude differed from chattel slavery because indentured servants are people who were willing to work to get transportation, land, clothes, food, or shelter instead of money. In chattel slavery, people are considered property instead of workers or servants. They can only be free when they purchased themselves or when their master(s) allowed them to be. Indentured servants get to be released when they have worked their part of the deal. Slaves don't get much in return for their work. Something that they do get is shelter, but most of the time, the shelter is small and is shared with other slaves.
Explanation:
The answer is: B. process language in their left cerebral hemisphere.
The left cerebral hemisphere held the function to make people able to process and understand the spoken language. When a communication is done verbally, individuals will mostly utilize their left cerebral hemisphere in order to process the language/
The right cerebral hemisphere held the function to make people able to process visual information. But,<u> </u><u><em>When communication is done through sign language studies show that deaf people still mostly lustily their left cerebral hemisphere.</em></u> It's just that they also activated a lot of areas in their right brain compared to non-deaf individuals.
<span>George Herbert Mead was a psychologist and philosopher whose studies led him to believe that human beings begin to develop their own self image through their interactions with others. This lays the groundwork for the development of the personality. Understanding the difference between "self" and "other" and being able to consider how others will respond to oneself further this process.</span>
This is most likely said by Rotter to Bandura. Although both theorists talk about Social Learning theory, Albert Bandura's theory only dwells on how personality is shaped by observation on the environment. Rotter furthermore expanded Bandura's theory by claiming that shaping human personality lies between the direct experiences of the individual and of the environment. He contended that personality is an interaction between the both stimuli, and does not depend on only either of the two.