1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
12345 [234]
3 years ago
5

List three countries that did not belong to either alliance Someone please help please

Social Studies
1 answer:
bezimeni [28]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Spain, Greece, and the Netherlands

Explanation:

The maps show us the alliances that existed before World War I. We can see that Triple Entente (painted in black) was composed of Great Britain, France, and Russia. They made an informal agreement, and these countries entered the war as Allied Powers. The map shows that the other alliance (hatched) was the Triple Alliance composed of Germany, Italy, and the Austria-Hungarian empire. They made Central powers in the war.

<u>The counties presented in white on the map are those that did not belong to any alliance. The three countries that did not belong to any alliance which we can see are:</u>

  • <u>Spain</u> – Spain did not ally with anyone, and it managed to remain neutral during the war. The King and prime minister did not want to get involved and wanted to try to benefit at the end of the war from the winner, no matter who it was. However, they did not and they had many economic problems. Their neutrality continued but ended in the Spanish Civil War
  • <u>Greece </u>– Greece had no previous alliances before the war. They also wanted to remain neutral but did not manage to do so. The King and prime minister had different ideas, and there was disagreement. They entered the war in 1917, on the side of the Allies.
  • <u>The Netherlands </u>– the Netherlands had neutral international affairs before the war and made no alliances, as seen by the map. Despite them being in the west, in the middle of the countries affected by the war, they managed to stay neutral during the whole war. The army guarded the border and there were mines on the coast to protect the land. They were also bombed and attacked from both sides during the war (allegedly by accident). Not everyone in the country wanted to remain neutral, but the Netherlands endured.

You might be interested in
In a within-subjects research study, factors that change over time, such a history and maturation, can be threats to
vazorg [7]
<span>They can be threats to internal validity, which refers to how well an experiment was conducted and whether the variables were kept separate.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Difference between nightangle and gandhi
4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

Mahatma Gandhi was dynamic person while Florence was simple and decent. ... Mahatma Gandhi worked to achieve a separate nation while Florence nightingale worked to serve the injured of war. Explanation: Florence nightingale was a British nurse and she used to serve as social reformer for the world.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the potential risks of using government policy to try to increase productivity?
Lesechka [4]

Answer:

When the government wants to increase productivity, which leads to higher standards of living, they can adopt policies that lead to investments in human capital and improvements in technology. ... Governments can help increase labor productivity and economic growth by encouraging investment in human capital.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
I need help pls and I need it now po​
o-na [289]

Answer:

1.) It was led by former Senate President Sergio Osmeña and House Speaker Manuel Roxas.

2.) It was a campaign for self-government and United States recognition of the independence of the Philippines.

Hope this helps.....

8 0
3 years ago
According to Section 402A of the Restatement of Torts, Second, one who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably d
vodka [1.7K]

Answer:

A product that is safe when delivered is subsequently mishandled or changed.

Explanation:

This section of the Restatement of Torts explains how the seller of a good can't be held accountable of a safe delivered product if it is subsequently mishandled or changed. This protects that seller of any legal liability of, according to the example, physical harm caused to the ultimate user or consumer. To add an example: if a perfectly fine pizza is delivered but the consumer claims that it's not, the delivery won't be made accountable (as long they can prove that it was, in fact, perfect when delivered).

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which two beliefs did the various Anabaptist sects hold in common? NEED HELP
    7·2 answers
  • The brazilian piraha language has words for the numbers "1" and "2." any numbers greater than "2" are referred to as "many." sho
    11·1 answer
  • Chapters 14 and 15 describe krakauer's successful attempt when he was 23 years old to climb the "devil's thumb," a mountain in a
    9·2 answers
  • how is gordimer's inclusion of the description of the miners also an explanation of why people are afraid I'm south african soci
    6·1 answer
  • Explain the principle of checks and balances as it relates to the president. Provide one example to support you explanation.
    5·1 answer
  • The idea that the journalist's job is to get news to the public quickly, avoid stories with unverified content, and reach as wid
    11·1 answer
  • Did Taoism begin in India
    14·1 answer
  • Johannes Gutenburg's major contribution to culture was A. the printing press B. his works of poetry C. support of Martin Luther’
    14·2 answers
  • Which country has the largest supply of fresh water?.
    13·1 answer
  • write an essay evaluating the indian removal act and its effect on americas deveolpment as a nation did it help grow the nation
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!