Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
We see the effects of perpetuated industrialization in every aspect of our lives; in the fetishism of commodities and in the rapid commodification of every aspect of our lives, in the development of capital to the point where it and its constituents are the sole dictators of society, and through the effects of industrialization on the globe, climate, etc.
We also can empirically and easily see that wealth inequality has been inevitably rising over time, as the gap between rich and poor has been getting wider over the years. Marx claimed that the industrial revolution had polarised the gap between the owners of the means of production (the capitalist class, the bourgoesie) and the workers (the proletariat) even further, and such was obviously true and is apparent in any analysis of the aforementioned event.
<span>Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is an economic measure of a nation's total income and output for a given time period (usually a year). Economists use GDP to measure the relative wealth and prosperity of different nations, as well as to measure the overall growth or decline of a nation's economy.</span>
The question is incomplete and the full version can be found online.
Answer: Independent Samples t-test
Explanation:
The independent samples t test, also called an unpaired samples t test, is used to compare two sets of data from samples that are independent.
This experiment compares two sets of data, the grades from the group of learners that took the course in the old format and the group that took it in the new format, to see if the grades differ depending on the format of the course.
The one sample t test wouldn´t be correct because it´s used to compare one result with an expected value. And the paired t test wouldn´t be correct because it´s used to compare related observations, such as test scores from a test taken at different hours of the day.
Sarajevo was historically a multiethnic city, and many different people from different ethnicities considered it home. Because of this, politicians, as well as citizens, might be interested in restoring this legacy.
There are some merits to this idea. The fact that Sarajevo was so diverse meant that many different opinions and ways of being existed simultaneouly. This made it a very rich place. Moreover, this would allow members from different communities to be able to live in their home again.
On the other hand, there are many obstacles to this. The main obstacle is that racism and discrimination are still common in the city. Moreover, many minorities might have permanently moved to other areas and might not be interested in returning. These factors could make it difficult for people to return to Sarajevo and make it a multicultural place once more.