Answer:
What invention would most improve your daily life?
Explanation:
Questions we ask ourselves when considering how would our daily life will be improved by inventions require divergent thinking:
That means using creativity, innovative proposals and often vague ideas thate need to be further worked out. Normally when we engage in certain activities this thinking later requires the convergent thinking in order to make ideas something possible. Think of brainstorming as a clear way to use divergent thinking, the See below ! :)
James oglethorpe founded it
By definition it would be the millitary
According to Psychological findings, If Jeremy has a social anxiety disorder, he might adopt safety behavior to reduce anxiety in social situations is "<u>asking other people lots of questions."</u>
This is because individual suffering from social anxiety disorder tends to exhibit irrational behaviors such as unnecessary anxiety, fear, self-consciousness, and humiliation.
Thus to solve or reduce the social anxiety disorder, it is expected that such individuals would be asking a lot of questions from people around to be sure of what is to happen next or what people feels is going to happen.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that asking other people lots of questions can reduce social anxiety disorder.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/15699404
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
