1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AlekseyPX
3 years ago
6

What is the solution set for 2+6−16=0

Mathematics
1 answer:
Dovator [93]3 years ago
7 0

2+6−16=0

Do the addition first because of using PEMDAS

P= parenthesis

E= exponents

M= multiplication

D= division

A= addition

S= subtraction

8-16= 0

-8= 0

Answer: -8= 0 , does not equal to each other.

You might be interested in
{29, 29, 29, 28, 28, 27}
Tatiana [17]
A is the answer hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An oblique cylinder has a radius of 10 units and slant
In-s [12.5K]

Answer: 2,400 cubic units

Step-by-step explanation: I just did the test sorry I'm late

5 0
3 years ago
2,000.h for h = 0.004<br> 2,000 h =
Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

2000×0.004=8

Step-by-step explanation:

Isolate the variable by dividing each side edit its factors that don't contain the variable

6 0
3 years ago
X/5=3<br> A)3/5<br> B)1/5<br> C)15<br> D)5/3
valentinak56 [21]
X/5=3  multiply both sides by 5

x=15
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls answer 17 and 18 I will give brainist
Nataly_w [17]

Answers:

<h2>17. B</h2><h2>18. B</h2>

Step-by-step explanation:

17. We need to understand what an indirect proof is. In an indirect proof, you prove a statement by showing that the negation of the statement is false.

The "then" part of the conditional is the "to prove" statement.

In an indirect proof, we assume the opposite of what we want to prove, this is also called proof by contradiction.

So if we need to prove angle A is not an obtuse angle, we will assume it is and then use the proof format to show that angle A cannot be obtuse.

<h2>The answer is B: Assume angle A is an obtuse angle</h2>

18. This question is asking us to use an indirect proof again. The "then" part of the statement is "KL > JK" and is the "to prove" statement.

We need the opposite of this, which would be assuming that KL <u><</u> JK.

<h2>The answer is B: Assume that KL <u><</u> JK</h2><h2>I'm always happy to help :)</h2>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Does there exist a relation that is not a function
    12·1 answer
  • Sarah pays a 20% deposit for a new TV and then an extra $96. What’s the total cost?
    14·1 answer
  • Mark got 14 problems wrong in his test. His score was 72% correct. How many problems were on the test?
    13·1 answer
  • Would love it if one of you would help me.... please
    5·2 answers
  • Is the answer is b please help
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about the end behavior of the graphed function?
    11·1 answer
  • A 6.5 foot street sign casts a 10-foot shadow while a telephone pole casts a 40-foot shadow. How tall
    8·2 answers
  • What did he do wrong
    6·1 answer
  • Select the formula for the xth term of the sequence.<br> 3, 11, 19,
    9·1 answer
  • Last year, a banquet hall charged $30 per person, and 60 people attended
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!