its is correct this is correct beacuse hen you think about the question the answer will be the answer you got.
The noun clause in the given sentence is an indirect object.
Explanation:
A noun clause is a dependent clause that acts as a noun and can fulfill the function of a subject, direct and indirect object, object of a preposition, or predicate nominative. Noun clauses begin with words such as <em>how, that, what, whatever, when, where, whether, which, whichever, who, whoever, whom, whomever, </em>and <em>why. </em>In the given sentence, a noun clause is <em>whomever wins the Spirit Award.</em>
An indirect object usually refers to someone or something that is affected by the action of a transitive verb, most commonly as a recipient. <em>Whomever wins the Spirit Award </em>is an indirect object of the sentence and represents the recipient (someone who will receive a scholarship).
The subject of the sentence is <em>the league. </em>As there is no preposition in the sentence, the given noun phrase can't be an object of a preposition. The predicate nominative is a noun that follows a linking verb and renames or describes the subject. Nothing like that is encountered in the sentence either. So, the correct option is<em> indirect object.</em>
Learn more about noun clauses here: brainly.com/question/2416201
#LearnWithBrainly
The answer is CONFLICTED AND RELUCTANT
<span>The answer is C: The author's description "blood-warm waters" is symbolism.
</span>
Answer:
B. It provides more relatable examples of tribalism, as well the author's own experiences.
Explanation:
Option B is the correct answer that contribute to the development of ideas in the text.
In Paragraph 11, the author provides relatable examples of tribalism such as those that have cliques in junior high school and sport fans with painted faces that support their teams. The author also shares his own experience of when he was growing in Brazil, how he ferociously supported his local soccer team. These related examples he gives help to contribute to the ideas the author developments in the text.
This is taken from <em>The Madness Of Humanity Part 3: Tribalism </em>by<em> Marcelo Gleiser .</em>
